Skip to comments.
Clint Eastwood's daughter under fire after destroying a $100,000 Hermes Birkin handbag
Telegraph UK ^
| May 29, 2012
| Belinda White
Posted on 05/30/2012 4:45:39 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: rightwingintelligentsia
To: rightwingintelligentsia
3
posted on
05/30/2012 4:48:38 AM PDT
by
PeteB570
( Islam is the sea in which the Terrorist Shark swims. The deeper the sea the larger the shark.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
These people are terminally bored.
Which makes them terminally boring.
They can do as they like, but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.
4
posted on
05/30/2012 4:49:30 AM PDT
by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I don’t care about the artsy-fartsy crap, but if it was her bag she could crap in it and feed it back to the crocs, for all I care. Just gave a job to croc-bag maker and a hunter, skinner and a tanner.
To: Clint N. Suhks
Oh, the Hand-baggery!!
Would it make Mrs. S. weep?
6
posted on
05/30/2012 4:54:16 AM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Be careful of believing something just because you want it to be true.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
"For her part, Francesca is so far unfazed by the reaction with sources close to her telling TMZ she knew people would be shocked, but that they just don't understand art."
My favorite part of the story. We little people just don't understand art. It takes an 18 year old spoiled brat to teach us the true beauty and meaning of art. Thank you Francesca....
To: rightwingintelligentsia
This kind of crapart is about as worthwhile as watching Steve O from Jackass shoot bottle rockets out of his butt.
On second thought, it’s less worthwhile.
(By the way - I had the tagline a long time before this stunt. Even Ween was ahead of curve as opposed to this vacuous duo.)
8
posted on
05/30/2012 5:04:18 AM PDT
by
shibumi
(Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Take off the Hermes label, and the handbag is only worth $500...
9
posted on
05/30/2012 5:09:56 AM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Greed + Envy = Liberalism)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
It's not like she destoyed something productive worth $100,000 such as a piece of constuction equipment. She destroyed $20 of leather with $99,980 of celebrity ego added to it.
10
posted on
05/30/2012 5:11:24 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
11
posted on
05/30/2012 5:15:52 AM PDT
by
HereInTheHeartland
(We are the 53%. 47% of Americans pay no taxes; end the free ride...)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
She has no Hermès bags, only scarves. Thank God!
No she pretty much just wears her Blueberry lately. Sometimes her Channel
for dressy stuff. Her Jimmy Shoe, Goochi and Louie Futons stay in the closet.
I hid her Sacks card...
To: Tax-chick
Eastwood and Shields - known for his work with video portraits and celebrity photography - decided to publicly demolish a $100,000 crocodile Hermès Birkin bag by setting it on fire before taking a chainsaw to it, all in the name of art. It's all fun and games until someone wrecks a handbag.
All this righteous indignation over the destruction of a $100k bag, but not a raised eyebrow over a *$100k* bag. Looks like the bag-burners are the ones who had a better idea of the true value and use for the idol er bag, although they surely could have picked up its twin at a flea market for $10... :-)
13
posted on
05/30/2012 5:17:59 AM PDT
by
Ezekiel
(The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Mrs. Eastwood is even more vapid than Kris Kardashian.
I did not think that was even possible.
14
posted on
05/30/2012 5:20:56 AM PDT
by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemies of freedom. Be Andrew Breitbart.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
In attempting to educate us unwashed peasants about “art,” she unwittingly revealed herself for an utter fool, in that she paid $100,000 for a satchel to carry her tampons in.
And she also pointed up the duplicity of a cadre of elitists who berate the common folks for neglecting the poor and downtrodden, while she and her friends vainly waste $100K on a self-indulgent stunt. That $100K could have fed a few starving peasants for years.
15
posted on
05/30/2012 5:21:11 AM PDT
by
IronJack
(=)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Ah, the ageless art of large-scale panty-knotting.
16
posted on
05/30/2012 5:23:00 AM PDT
by
Méabh
To: rightwingintelligentsia
What a waste of money.
She should have spent it on vodka, heroin, and a sex change, like a normal celebrity kid.
17
posted on
05/30/2012 5:23:27 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
To: Cowboy Bob
"
Take off the Hermes label, and the handbag is only worth $500..."
I suspect that was the point of the whole affair. I am sure that the first thing most people thought when they read this was "How can a handbag be worth 100K"? By destroying the handbag in such a frivolous manner, they are rejecting the notion that it has such a value, although they had to pay 100K to do it.
19
posted on
05/30/2012 5:29:21 AM PDT
by
PUGACHEV
To: Clint N. Suhks
LOL!
BF bought me a fake Pravda at the flea market for $10 (he actually thought it was real!).
20
posted on
05/30/2012 5:30:17 AM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Be careful of believing something just because you want it to be true.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson