To: norwaypinesavage
"And Romney is a lousy candidate with a lousy campaign."
You certainly didn't get that from the article. Dunn said: "his primary campaign of the past few months has been one of the most impressive of recent years by any politician on either side of the aisle." He certainly eviscerated all of his opponents.
What is the basis for your statement?
A belief that reality is the way the writer imagines it to be combined with a certainty that if it didn't go that way, it could have nothing at all to do with his ideas or the way he went about promoting them but only with something nefarious done by someone else, the answer being to refuse support to any but his now-rejected chosen even if it means the re-election of a socialist putz but that's okay because it'll show Romney and the GOP-e that he, the disgruntled, is a real force to be reckoned with and that if they had only listened to him everything would have been all right?
15 posted on
05/30/2012 4:18:00 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: aruanan
Punctuation is your friend. Your rant is unreadable.
16 posted on
05/30/2012 4:21:42 AM PDT by
norwaypinesavage
(Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson