Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JustSayNoToNannies

Still pushing drugs, eh Nanny.

You want ALL drugs to have NO restrictions at the federal level, but somehow you want communities (like yours, as you stated) to be able to overturn that federal de-regulation to make those same drugs you want legalized to be banned from your community.

In other words, you want the federal government to push the destruction of drug usage into everyone’s back yard but not in your backyard.

And it’s pretty funny how you say that the report of this heinous crime being caused by a new type of LSD is Sensationalist.

Can you hear yourself?

The guy gnawed the face off another human being, and this type of deranged violence is consistent with several other cases in the same area.

And you focus on people discussing the drug aspect of this as ‘sensationalist garbage.’

It seems you still have trouble understands linguistic usage. When someone says ‘a new form of LSD,’ they are not discussing chemistry. They are discussing a drug people take for a particular type of drug experience. You know, that sort of thing you want to be prevalent on every American street (except yours).


22 posted on 05/30/2012 5:44:30 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival. (Ron Paul is the Lyndon Larouche of the 21st century.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

I despise drugs but there’s no drug in the world that will make a decent human being do something like this. This guy was a sicko regardless of drug use or no drug use.


24 posted on 05/30/2012 4:24:08 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Sensationalist garbage: no blood-test results have been made public, and the very idea of a "new form of LSD" is chemically illiterate - you might as well talk about "a new form of H2O."

Still pushing drugs, eh Nanny.

Never have, never will. Still telling falsehoods about those who disagree with you, eh?

You want ALL drugs to have NO restrictions at the federal level, but somehow you want communities (like yours, as you stated) to be able to overturn that federal de-regulation

No "overturning" required ... my community - and your too, I'm sure - has a plethora of statutes (residential speed limits, zoning, etc. etc.) that in no way depend on the feds.

to make those same drugs you want legalized to be banned from your community.

In other words, you want the federal government to push the destruction of drug usage into everyone’s back yard

To legalize is not to "push" - there are no federal laws against insulting one's spouse.

It seems you still have trouble understands linguistic usage. When someone says ‘a new form of LSD,’ they are not discussing chemistry. They are discussing a drug people take for a particular type of drug experience.

There's already a word for that: "hallucinogen." LSD is a specific chemical compound and only one of many hallucinogens.

You know, that sort of thing you want to be prevalent on every American street (except yours).

No, I want every community to make its own decision. Why don't you want that?

28 posted on 06/06/2012 11:55:07 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson