Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Sensationalist garbage: no blood-test results have been made public, and the very idea of a "new form of LSD" is chemically illiterate - you might as well talk about "a new form of H2O."

Still pushing drugs, eh Nanny.

Never have, never will. Still telling falsehoods about those who disagree with you, eh?

You want ALL drugs to have NO restrictions at the federal level, but somehow you want communities (like yours, as you stated) to be able to overturn that federal de-regulation

No "overturning" required ... my community - and your too, I'm sure - has a plethora of statutes (residential speed limits, zoning, etc. etc.) that in no way depend on the feds.

to make those same drugs you want legalized to be banned from your community.

In other words, you want the federal government to push the destruction of drug usage into everyone’s back yard

To legalize is not to "push" - there are no federal laws against insulting one's spouse.

It seems you still have trouble understands linguistic usage. When someone says ‘a new form of LSD,’ they are not discussing chemistry. They are discussing a drug people take for a particular type of drug experience.

There's already a word for that: "hallucinogen." LSD is a specific chemical compound and only one of many hallucinogens.

You know, that sort of thing you want to be prevalent on every American street (except yours).

No, I want every community to make its own decision. Why don't you want that?

28 posted on 06/06/2012 11:55:07 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: JustSayNoToNannies

Silly, Nanny.

You keep using your copy-and-paste to appear logical, while proving the illogic of your position.

You have already stated, numerous times, that you want there to be NO restrictions on any type of drugs that people want to make, sell, and use.

Period.

That is your position. The hell that comes with such a position is your doing.

But you sure as hell can’t lift all restrictions at the federal level and then think small communities will be able to make their own decisions contrary to what is legal at the federal law.

And before you go on some addled illogical reaction, please point to the community in the US that has successfully outlawed abortion.

You see, Nanny, I call you Nanny, because you have been brainwashed into believing that if you lift any and all restrictions at the highest level of government, you somehow free the people to make their own choices. You are wrong. When you impose a Soviet-style mandate at that level, you are forcing a morality down the throats of every state, every county, every town, every neighborhood, every family, and every individual in the country.

You, sir, and your anarcho-Sovietism are the ultimate Nanny.


31 posted on 06/06/2012 7:23:47 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival. (Ron Paul is the Lyndon Larouche of the 21st century.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

To legalize is not to push, eh.

So did abortion in the US increase or decrease after Roe v. Wade?

Seriously, do you not see, or do you really refuse to admit that when a society condones something by legalizing it will become more prevalent?

You can’t seriously pretend that it diminishes, can you?


32 posted on 06/06/2012 7:27:46 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival. (Ron Paul is the Lyndon Larouche of the 21st century.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson