There is no conflicting info on addresses IN THE FBI FILE. This is something made up by Fred Nerks. If you read the posts carefully by the tag team at least one tried to claim that the FBI file says he lived 35 miles from Honolulu into the 60s. It just isn’t true.
There IS information on the progression of his residences in the FBI file. It took very little time for me to find the FBI files and it took very little time to see this progression..that for some reason Fred Nerks won’t admit exists as he continues to deflect from FMD...with a concocted scheme of a fake son , fake mother, fake birth certificate, and an elaborate cover story that couldn’t possibly have happened without the assistance of the government at the time.
Sheesh, Ann went into a country that was a hotbed of Communism. A country that the CIA had been trying to overthrow since at least the 50s even to the point where they used a fake Honey trap.
A country that was still ruthlessly killing people that were Communists when she went..and the CIA didn’t know about Ann given Lolo was attending a CIA affiliated school??? No concocted scheme that Fred Nerks is espousing could have happened without assistance that lasted this long with info down a black hole.
It is beyond me how someone can claim I am barking mad for thinking the family was involved with the CIA when those same people concoct a bizarre fake cover story for a fake son, fake mother, fake birth certificate.
From My Post:
“I will point you to this information AGAIN:
From my post:
“1958 Honolulu
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Frank_Marshall_Davis_2.pdf
page 5 of pdf
July 22 1960 SAME ADDRESS
later
June 29 1961 SAME ADDRESS
later
July 12 1962 SAME ADDRESS
I have never bothered to look at where FMD was living in certain years until last night...when such a brouhaha was made out of it.
It is beyond me why people who were interested in where he lived couldn’t find this info. I know it wasn’t just put on the net.”
For every single year since 1957 the FBI file shows he lived in Honolulu until 1963 INCLUDING 1960. I even made a post that went through the progression of years with the exact wording of each year .
This HUGE question for me is:
Why continue the charade of FMD not being in Honolulu when the FBI file says he was???
Here’s something to consider.
Finding what ever facts there are - sourced facts, not what some guy writes in a book - without pretending to know or speculate about motives or grandiose plans - is one method of determining the unknown. Looking for facts no matter where they take one. Find enough facts, and the persons and motives become clear.
Second method - find a few facts, add to the meager mixture “stuff written in books” that is not sourced, and then speculate about motives and connections and grandiose plans and from that time on, reject facts that don’t fit one’s fondly held beliefs, but instead, use the prism of fondly held beliefs as spectacles to determine what is useful and what to reject.
Which method works better to find the truth?
FN is using the first method.
RC is using the second method.
The only way to see this forest is to clear the mind utterly of any preconceptions about the principals involved. When I finally did that I could see the forest. CLing on to beliefs - any of the myth in “Dreams” - and the result is you have to keep trying to stuff square pegs into round holes for years. Nothing fits...