Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPJ

Some people have lived in a home for more than a decade and seen individuals move into the area that eventually necessitated greater police presence. In that situation, was it the individuals fault for living there and not having the means to pick up roots and move? Should they have to pay more for the threat that befell them simply because They were minding their own business and had the bad luck of poor neighbors moving in?

BTW, I don’t think the police are there to protect you - they are generally there to file paperwork and look into things (if you’re lucky) after the fact. If you find an officer that actually takes the “to Protect and Serve” motto to heart, then you have found the exception...

I’m not trying to argue with you, that’s not my intent.


23 posted on 05/28/2012 7:57:30 AM PDT by jurroppi1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: jurroppi1

>>they are generally there to file paperwork and look into things (if you’re lucky) after the fact. <<

Which is why I call them *janitors*....they do little/nothing to prevent crime and are there for the *clean-up* after one has been committed.


28 posted on 05/28/2012 8:05:05 AM PDT by Daffynition (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: jurroppi1
BTW, I don’t think the police are there to protect you - they are generally there to file paperwork and look into things (if you’re lucky) after the fact. If you find an officer that actually takes the “to Protect and Serve” motto to heart, then you have found the exception...

Isn't this what a Security Guard does; Observe and Report?

35 posted on 05/28/2012 8:23:22 AM PDT by NY Attitude (Make love not war but be prepared for either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: jurroppi1

BTW, I don’t think the police are there to protect you - they are generally there to file paperwork and look into things (if you’re lucky) after the fact. If you find an officer that actually takes the “to Protect and Serve” motto to heart, then you have found the exception...
_________________________

Safety versus Scurity.

Safety is about protecting you.

Security is about trying to find your killer.


63 posted on 05/28/2012 9:12:47 AM PDT by Chickensoup (STOP The Great O-ppression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: jurroppi1
BTW, I don’t think the police are there to protect you - they are generally there to file paperwork and look into things (if you’re lucky) after the fact.

Police are not body guards. They can't BE with you - or any citizen necessarily -when a crime is going down. Maybe they'll be close by - but if someone breaks into your home and they're banging down your bedroom door - there's almost no chance a cop will be standing on your front lawn - ready to deal with the situation.

That's not going to happen.

Your fellow citizens do not have enough money to provide everyone with a full time bodyguard. That doesn't mean you're not being protected - it just means you're not being protected by anything even close to the Secret Service.

But you are protected... Here's some of what you get for your tax dollars: The guy trying to break into your bedroom to get at the safe? If the police catch him - or gather information to tie him to other crimes, they'll arrest him and - with any luck - the guy will go to prison.

While the criminal sitting in prison, he's not committing new crimes - to you or your neighbors. That's one way you're protected. There are other ways too..

94 posted on 05/28/2012 11:27:20 AM PDT by GOPJ ( "A Dog In Every Pot" - freeper ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson