In the eyes of our political class, there is no right to privacy, unless you want to kill an in-utero baby or if your grade schooler wants birth control pills.
1 posted on
05/27/2012 4:18:24 PM PDT by
bkopto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: bkopto
Depressing to see that it is an idiot pubbie proposing this.
2 posted on
05/27/2012 4:20:42 PM PDT by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: bkopto
Isn’t against the law in Iowa to take a photo of an industrial animal raising facility? Free speech phooey...long gone.
3 posted on
05/27/2012 4:22:18 PM PDT by
pointsal
To: bkopto
All users posting to websites would have to post their real name and address, non-compliant posts would be axed What a joke!
I would have to use EGPWS everywhere I interact on the Internet.
Personal freedom and personal rights are disappearing fast.
4 posted on
05/27/2012 4:23:24 PM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: bkopto
It’s only for the protection of right thinking people.
5 posted on
05/27/2012 4:26:49 PM PDT by
Drill Thrawl
(The United States of America, a banana republic since 1913)
To: bkopto
Good grief. No one should fear anything online. This isn’t grade school and there aren’t even sticks and stones. It’s printed. You don’t like it, don’t read it. Someone puts something on your facebook that hurts your widdle feelers then unfriend them and get off that stupid site. Someone emails you, block their address and delete it. How simple is that? But noooo, we have to have a Bill!!!! Some little minority of ridiculously stoooopid sheeple mess the internet up for the rest of us.
6 posted on
05/27/2012 4:28:54 PM PDT by
bgill
To: bkopto
It was introduced just over two months ago by Sen. Thomas F. O'Mara (RBig Flats). Wonder if he's friends with Dede Scozzafava
7 posted on
05/27/2012 4:29:04 PM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(FUMR)
To: bkopto
How is
a state gonna enforce this?
Only on web sites hosted in NYS? And how will it know who those are?
Do not the NYS idiots know how easy it is to move a web site?
8 posted on
05/27/2012 4:30:14 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Need is not an acceptable lifestyle choice; dependent is not a career. ~ Dr. Tim Nerenz)
To: bkopto
Someone needs to remind this ignorant fool that the Federalist Papers were published anonymously.
10 posted on
05/27/2012 4:32:46 PM PDT by
Maceman
To: bkopto
Instead of this idea, why not focus on voter ID?
Oh, well, silly to bring it up I guess...
12 posted on
05/27/2012 4:34:50 PM PDT by
Beowulf9
To: bkopto
Shades of Hussein’s “National User ID”.
13 posted on
05/27/2012 4:35:46 PM PDT by
kevcol
To: bkopto
So...voter i.d. laws are unconstitutional, but you will have to prove who you are on an anonymous site on the internet to simply post an opinion?
Makes perfect sense to me.
14 posted on
05/27/2012 4:38:09 PM PDT by
berdie
To: bkopto
This is a good application for rule .308
15 posted on
05/27/2012 4:38:28 PM PDT by
Drill Thrawl
(The United States of America, a banana republic since 1913)
To: bkopto
Post Office box rentals will soar.
16 posted on
05/27/2012 4:39:26 PM PDT by
lightman
(Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
To: bkopto
That NC teacher who threatened her student with arrest for criticizing Obama was just a few months ahead of her time...
This is the first step toward a new Sedition Act....
17 posted on
05/27/2012 4:42:16 PM PDT by
Uncle Ike
(Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
To: bkopto
The bill is bad enough on its own, proposed by a Republican, makes me want t vomit.
19 posted on
05/27/2012 4:46:17 PM PDT by
svcw
(If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
To: bkopto
I’ll post my real name.
KISS MY ASS
20 posted on
05/27/2012 5:00:22 PM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: bkopto
So you look up the address of a local cemetery & you sign yourself as one of the original signers of the Declaration of Independence. You have a legitimate name & address & it f*cks with the totalitarians.
To: bkopto
Maybe they should just round up all the intellectuals and have them killed?
-PJ
25 posted on
05/27/2012 5:23:26 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
To: bkopto
It's unclear exactly how much support the bill has in the State Senate. It was introduced just over two months ago by Sen. Thomas F. O'Mara (RBig Flats).
![Senator Thomas O'Mara](http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/Sen_Thomas_O_Mara.jpg)
New York Republican State Senator Thomas O'Mara wants to force anonymous internet posters to surrender their right to anonymous free speech.
[Image Source: Thomas O'Mara] Republican!!!!!
26 posted on
05/27/2012 5:25:37 PM PDT by
dennisw
To: bkopto
IF a hundred million people post en masse and often, posting their real names and addresses each time, even the tyrannical Obama administration will be overwhelmed.
However, anonymity is necessary for the ordinary citizen who is at the mercy of Holder and his “people”.
27 posted on
05/27/2012 5:26:38 PM PDT by
Twinkie
(John 3:16)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson