Repeat yourself all you want; you still make no sense.
“If she procreates...” What about if HE procreates?
If a woman is pregnant, some guy has also procreated. This is inarguable.
And any man also has the power to remain childless if he so desires. Also inarguable.
Roe v Wade.
The First Trimester: The Court held that during the first 3 months, the decision to abort must be completely left to the judgment of the pregnant woman and her doctor. The State cannot interfere with the abortion decision at all.
There is no “man” in that paragraph. FreedomNotSafety is correct.
My argument is unassailable. Of course it takes two I never said it didn’t but that doesn’t change the fact that a women is the ultimate arbiter for child bearing. Women will always be able to find sperm donors. So why do you contend that because she finds a sperm donor who is either unable or unwilling to support the child it becomes a problem for the government to solve?