My argument is unassailable. Of course it takes two I never said it didn’t but that doesn’t change the fact that a women is the ultimate arbiter for child bearing. Women will always be able to find sperm donors. So why do you contend that because she finds a sperm donor who is either unable or unwilling to support the child it becomes a problem for the government to solve?
“My argument is unassailable.”
Except the part about all of America and Western Civilization now and throughout history disagreeing with you: men must support their children.
“Women will always be able to find sperm donors.”
I think you mean women will be able to find “men who are willingly making the choice to have sex with women they’re not married to.”
“So why do you contend that because she finds a sperm donor who is either unable or unwilling to support the child it becomes a problem for the government to solve?”
Because by “the government,” you mean my tax dollars. And I’m not paying for your kid; I’d rather use the enforcement arm to make YOU pay for YOUR kid. You pay for your choice to have sex, not me.
Your contention that men have no “choice” (your word, and language of Roe v. Wade) is jaw-droppingly stupid. No choice whether to have sex? What are the stats of female-on-male rape?
I’m pretty sure there aren’t any.
Yeah, it’s all about “choice;” and he made his choice when he took her home or into the backseat or wherever.
Now he pays for it.
Because he's one of Tom Baugh's monkeys who needs to be starved.