[Ken H]

"Defendant (Zimmerman) has provided law enforcement with numerous statements, some of which are contradictory, and are inconsistent with the physical evidence and statements of witnesses," the prosecutors said in their court filing.

So how did investigators overlook such obvious pieces of evidence the first time?

[kanawa]

"inconsistent with the physical evidence and statements of witnesses"

So how did investigators overlook such obvious pieces of evidence the first time?

Witness statements have, ahem... evolved.

http://www.examiner.com/article/witness-tampering-trayvon-martin-case

[Conscience of a Conservative]

So how did investigators overlook such obvious pieces of evidence the first time?

1) They didn't - the initial investigator recommended charges (manslaughter, I believe)

2) This motion doesn't say when Zimmerman made these "contradictory" statements. It could have been after Corey's office took the case over.