1) They didn't - the initial investigator recommended charges (manslaughter, I believe)
2) This motion doesn't say when Zimmerman made these "contradictory" statements. It could have been after Corey's office took the case over.
So why wasn't he charged?
Ok despite all the hysterics here (and I generally support Z), it was quite clear at the bail hearing that the prosecution planned to rely on iconsistencies in Z’s statements.
Also, sealing the records appears to be supported by both sides. The evidence is not withheld from the defense.
The only possibly outrageous thing I saw here is referring to these statements as a “confession”. Had Z truly confessed to anything he would have been charged long ago.
Z certainly did not “murder” TM. However, he is in jeopardy on a lesser charge. One could question his decision to shoot when he did. That would be based on a claim he instigated the fight (I doubt he did) followed by whether he reasonably thought his life was in danger. That one is a closer call.
Re: “.....the initial investigator recommended charges (manslaughter, I believe).”
Incorrect.
The lead detective stated publicly to the Orlando Sentinel that he did NOT recommend ANY charge against Zimmerman.
What is your source for that?
This motion doesn't say when Zimmerman made these "contradictory" statements. It could have been after Corey's office took the case over.
Do we know for a fact that Zimmerman talked with Corey's office? I thought he offered to talk with them but it never happened.