You said...
“However if you form a group to promote this way of thinking it will be called racist, your meetings will be physically attacked by fascistic leftists, and these attacks will be ignored or even excused by self-conceived conservatives, even here on FR”
So a group was formed (Stormfront) to promote “this way of thinking” and it is “called racist”, by your formulation.
Is Stormfront just “called racist” or are they, in actuality a racist white supremacist group?
To put it another way, Stormfront is the white version of La Raza.
Because the racist group that got beat up are Stormfront members.
The linked article does not say this. It just doesn't. Start with the facts and then work from there.
You said...
However if you form a group to promote this way of thinking it will be called racist, your meetings will be physically attacked by fascistic leftists, and these attacks will be ignored or even excused by self-conceived conservatives, even here on FR
So a group was formed (Stormfront) to promote this way of thinking and it is called racist, by your formulation.
Is Stormfront just called racist or are they, in actuality a racist white supremacist group?
You have really messed up on your logic here. When I used the phrase "this way of thinking" I was referring quite specifically to the ideas expressed by FReeper "Crucial" in his Reply #54. (I even quoted those ideas in my reply to him.) Now you claim that Stormfront was founded to promote those ideas and criticize me for failing to recognize that this renders them racists.
This is nonsense.
The ideas expressed by Crucial in Reply #54 are simply not racist and you do not actually believe that they are. You are so happy and proud to be on your anti-racist high horse that you have posted sloppy nonsense instead of substantive analysis.
So again I ask you, why are you asking me about Stormfront? Whoever they are and whatever it is that they think, what does any of that have to do with what I have posted to this thread?