Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
I think you are doing very poor analysis here and that you should try to do better.

Because the racist group that got beat up are Stormfront members.

The linked article does not say this. It just doesn't. Start with the facts and then work from there.

You said...

“However if you form a group to promote this way of thinking it will be called racist, your meetings will be physically attacked by fascistic leftists, and these attacks will be ignored or even excused by self-conceived conservatives, even here on FR”

So a group was formed (Stormfront) to promote “this way of thinking” and it is “called racist”, by your formulation.

Is Stormfront just “called racist” or are they, in actuality a racist white supremacist group?

You have really messed up on your logic here. When I used the phrase "this way of thinking" I was referring quite specifically to the ideas expressed by FReeper "Crucial" in his Reply #54. (I even quoted those ideas in my reply to him.) Now you claim that Stormfront was founded to promote those ideas and criticize me for failing to recognize that this renders them racists.

This is nonsense.

The ideas expressed by Crucial in Reply #54 are simply not racist and you do not actually believe that they are. You are so happy and proud to be on your anti-racist high horse that you have posted sloppy nonsense instead of substantive analysis.

So again I ask you, why are you asking me about Stormfront? Whoever they are and whatever it is that they think, what does any of that have to do with what I have posted to this thread?

74 posted on 05/24/2012 3:18:37 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: rogue yam
I said: “Because the racist group that got beat up are Stormfront members.”

You said: The linked article does not say this. It just doesn't. Start with the facts and then work from there.

Perhaps you meant the EXCERPT of the article - because the LINKED article does say it.....

From the linked article.......

“The meeting of the Illinois European Heritage Association had been frequently mentioned on the “White Pride” webforum stormfront.org. It was called the “5 th Annual White Nationalist Economic summit” and promoted as an opportunity to “work for whites.”

The Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors extremist group activity, suggested that H.A.R.M. probably matched the names of those organizing the meeting on stormfront.org to those on a membership list of the neo-Nazi National Socialist Movement.”

So is Stromfront just “called racist” or are they actually a racist group?

Do you think the Nazi's were proud of their German heritage? Do you think their organization was about conserving “heritage” or was it about hate and violence?

78 posted on 05/25/2012 6:40:14 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson