I wasn’t talking about requesting the records for Obama. What I want to see at this point is the communications between Bennett and the Hawaii people. How did his request have to be changed?
What I can see that differs between Bennett’s request and what he received is that this request was not fulfilled by the final response:
“Additionally, please verify that the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama is a true and accurate representation of the original record in your files.”
What they got was just that the INFORMATION on what Obama posted is the same as what they have. They wouldn’t say that it is a true and accurate representation of the original record in their files.
Fake but accurate. That’s what they seem to be claiming.
They also say that the information contained in the vital record on file was used to verify the facts of the vital event. IOW, they are claiming that what is sworn in the record swears that the facts are true. Well duh. The record verifies the record. Notice that THEY nowhere state that these ARE the facts of birth. Thay can’t legally say that if the birth record is REALLY half written (supporting affidavits) and half typed (incomplete BC form originally filed with the local registrar by Madelyn Dunham) as Fukino indicated.
Obama posted a forgery because it was a “composite” of an incomplete BC and affidavits required to complete the BC much later.
Sort of like his “composite girlfriends”. Everything about this guy is manufactured.
And the HDOH’s unwillingness to say that “the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama is a true and accurate representation of the original record in your files” is an admission by Alvin Onaka that he has known all along that Obama posted a forgery. “Fake but accurate”. It just doesn’t reveal that the BC is late, amended, and relies on affidavits to fill in what was missing because Obama wasn’t examined by a Hawaii doctor in 1961.
Look at what Onaka actually says that HE verifies. He verifies that there is a birth certificate “indicating” that Obama was born in HI. He just lists details without saying what HE verifies about them. And then he verifies that “the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record in our files.”
Below that he “certifies” that “the information contained in the vital record on file with the Department of Health was used to verify the facts of the vital event”.
Used by WHO to verify the facts of the vital event, Mr. Onaka? By you? You never said that you verified the actual facts of the vital event. The only thing you actually put your name as verifying was that a birth certificate is on file “indicating” that Obama was born in HI. There was no sentence clarifying what #2-12 represented - what you personally verify, or what the birth certificate CLAIMS, whether accurate and/or legally valid or not.
Well stated. Like I said...on par with toilet paper.
“What they got was just that the INFORMATION on what Obama posted is the same as what they have.”
__
You are correct. What Onaka said is that the information, as listed in Bennett’s verification request, is the same as the information in Hawaii’s official records.
As I said, once it’s established that the records contain that information, the Full Faith and Credit clause takes over.