Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
...it was never claimed that the record was legally valid.
Yes, I'm aware of that.
I value this "response" to be on the same par as toilet paper.
All it's good for is wiping one's backside.

But hey, when you give someone wriggle room, like Bennett did, they're always going to take it.

177 posted on 05/23/2012 12:35:41 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

That’s my view too. I want to see how Bennett “changed the wording” on his request. I’m betting he changed the part about the attached BC being an “accurate and true representation” of what they have on file. Onaka couldn’t agree to verify that, because he knows Obama’s BC was a forgery.

And if I was a gambler I’d bet a lot of money that an audit of the computer transaction logs would show that BC# taken from Virginia Sunahara and given to Obama. The rest of that probably was actually claimed on a document (or a combination of multiple documents) for Obama.


189 posted on 05/23/2012 1:09:25 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson