__________________________________
Please show where, in law, a suggestion is evidence.
The point is a simple one. There are many freepers swearing that Martin attacked Zimmerman and getting truly upset when asked for proof. Regardless of how upset they get, none can provide proof beyond 'suggestions'.
“Please show where, in law, a suggestion is evidence.”
Suggested is just the word I chose to describe it. Like all evidence, it doesn’t absolutely establish anything, but rather only leads reasonable people to believe something. I don’t have to show you where interpreting wounds to determine who attacked and who defended themselves has been used as evidence because it’s to common to require proof. That’d be like asking me to show where, in law, what is suggested by eye witness testimony is evidence.
“There are many freepers swearing that Martin attacked Zimmerman and getting truly upset when asked for proof. Regardless of how upset they get, none can provide proof beyond ‘suggestions’”
That’s not the point, really. You seem to get upset, too. The point is that when asked for evidence, no matter how pissy they are or how often they accuse you of being a crypto-leftist, they can produce it. And that’s all evidence often is, by the way, a “suggestion.” A suggestion that, like I said, would lead reasonable people to a certain conclusion. But a suggestion nonetheless.