And your point is doubly absurd in that there is far more evidence that Martin attacked Zimmerman than your possibility that Zimmerman instigated a physical confrontation with Martin - and the state has to reach the threshhold of beyond a reasonable doubt against Zimmerman, when it can't even muster any evidence that I have seen to contradict Zimmerman's version - which an investigator has confirmed under oath. Zimmerman was well within his legal rights to follow a suspicious person without physically confronting them - unless you can point to any Florida statutes to the contrary.
Zimmerman's claims pass the Occam's razor test with flying colors. Your position doesn't even pass the smell test.
If you have real evidence then post it. But you won't because there is none.