Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

I want to know why there is not ONE publicly funded conservative television station considered main stream? Why not? Why not a conservative PBS? Why can’t we all get together and fund this? Are we too divided? Are we not really concerned?

Must not be because it’s been this way as long as I can remember. I was a teenager and my brother had enlisted during the war in Nam. I noticed no patriot news and I rarely watched the news.


11 posted on 05/17/2012 4:44:02 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: huldah1776
"Why not a conservative PBS?"... Why? it's an oxymoron maybe...
12 posted on 05/17/2012 5:11:32 AM PDT by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: huldah1776
I want to know why there is not ONE publicly funded conservative television station considered main stream? Why not? Why not a conservative PBS? Why can’t we all get together and fund this? Are we too divided? Are we not really concerned?

When I think of PBS, my first thought is that it should be apolitical--that the question would be, "why can't we watch something without a political slant?"

I will say that conservatives have done much better on the radio airwaves, and perhaps they're thinking, "why fix something that's not broken?"

19 posted on 05/17/2012 5:36:11 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a filibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: huldah1776
I want to know why there is not ONE publicly funded conservative television station considered main stream? Why not? Why not a conservative PBS? Why can’t we all get together and fund this? Are we too divided? Are we not really concerned? Must not be because it’s been this way as long as I can remember. I was a teenager and my brother had enlisted during the war in Nam. I noticed no patriot news and I rarely watched the news.

In the old days, there were 3 networks, newsweeklies such as Time-Lies' Time and Life magazine (current owners of CNN and Bill Maher's HBO), et al.

They agreed on the liberal agenda and did their best to advance it. In 1968, they disagreed with the Democrat Party leadership (the liberal wing wanted Eugene McCarthy) and attempted to revolt inside and outside the convention.

After 1968, the New Democrats took over academia, network anchor positions, and the DNC.

The only way to recover the institutions of media and academia are to expose the FRAUD of the New Democrat establishment in the media, academic, and political arenas.

They must be entirely discredited as Joe McCarthy was and run out of town on a rail. They LIE to the public and their intentions are NOT honorable. They are beyond hypocrites, they are Stalinist socialists who lie to sway the masses with no attempts to cover up their bullstalin or hint of embarrassment over the twisted logic of persons like Sandra Fluke who wined and dined on vacation in Spain while b!tching that she couldn't afford law school AND contraceptives and defended Bill Maher's "nuanced" used of pejorative terms like c*nt and slut.

28 posted on 05/17/2012 9:35:56 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama has cut and run from what he called "the right war".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson