Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Smith Lectures France About Paying Taxes Until Learning Of Their 75% Rate
Breitbart.TV ^

Posted on 05/14/2012 8:03:34 PM PDT by Sneakyuser

His reaction is priceless.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doublestandard; france; hollywood; hollywoodreds; liberals; marxism; mediabias; redistribution; taxes; usefulidiot; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Sneakyuser

Why is he even asked about politics or economics? He’s an actor — most can’t even balance their own books. Let actors act (or pretend to), let’s not make them economic/political pundits...


21 posted on 05/14/2012 8:40:17 PM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sneakyuser

If my taxes were raised to 75%, I’d start selling drugs or making bootleg whiskey. I know little of either, so I’d have to learn fast. lol


22 posted on 05/14/2012 8:40:41 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sneakyuser

Being a slave to the government is great. WS will still stay on the government plantation.


23 posted on 05/14/2012 8:40:58 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sneakyuser

The title of the video reads, “Will Smith stupéfié par la taxation de Hollande”.

Are we sure he was told France’s tax rate, or was he told Hollands?


24 posted on 05/14/2012 8:41:33 PM PDT by Darnright ("I don't trust liberals, I trust conservatives." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sneakyuser

I enjoy Smith’s movies, but he’s a moron.


25 posted on 05/14/2012 8:43:30 PM PDT by Lancey Howard (No Romney, no way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

to be fair, it is 75% tax for those households that earn more than 1 million euros a year, not for most salaried people. That being said, a 75% tax on the rich is stupid — the rich folks have means to escape this that the middle class can’t — the rich in France can leave, or play around with the way their money is marked as earned. Either way, it means LESS coming in terms of taxes. And the hidden costs will be huge — less investment in France, less money in state coffers.


26 posted on 05/14/2012 8:45:14 PM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Darnright

LMAO!!
(Stick around here and you will become very knowledgable about everything.)

Hollande defeated Sarkozy in last week’s French elections and will take over as its leader.


27 posted on 05/14/2012 8:49:31 PM PDT by Lancey Howard (No Romney, no way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sneakyuser

James Brown knew that America was the only place where he could have risen to the heights he did and enjoy the fruits of his labor.

He was a proud American and made sure to tell people to stay in school, do something to make something of themselves, don’t let anyone hold you back, and recognize that the rest of the world does NOT have the same opportunities that exist here.

The Left (Black Panther Party included) resented James Brown for being a “capitalist”. He saw nothing wrong with it.


28 posted on 05/14/2012 8:51:31 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama has cut and run from what he called "the right war".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sneakyuser

Interesting....he thought 30% sounded reasonable.


29 posted on 05/14/2012 8:55:25 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Julia!!!!!! Don't Let Him Fool 'ya!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sneakyuser

To quote a brilliant FreePer: Will Smith is “The Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers”.


30 posted on 05/14/2012 8:59:36 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk
Well, his eyes got pretty big!

His eyes opened to the world of politics. If you are taking in 75% tax-rate on anyone earning more than $100,000, there is plenty to skim as a politician living high on the hog as the Politburo.

Fancy cars and vacations on the taxpayer's dime.

Hollywood boxoffice can't last forever.

31 posted on 05/14/2012 9:00:30 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama has cut and run from what he called "the right war".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve; andyk

No kidding? That is rich! Thanks for the quote.
Priceless!


32 posted on 05/14/2012 9:00:58 PM PDT by RitaOK (Nevermind, Newt. Forget the convention. I'm trusting God for the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Rich in America starts at 100,000 (or even 75,000).

While you hear Obama talk about those earning millions, they always scale the figure back to $250,000 and even below that.

Al Gore once claimed that persons earning $250,000 were millionaires because in 4 years they’d have earned a million. Yes the dope actually used that logic.

It’s like the guy haggling with the whore over going to bed for a million dollars or ten dollars. They want to establish the concept of confiscatory taxes and then settle on the amount (as low a threshold as possible).

Red Ted Kennedy fought to maintain inheritance taxes. His estate is going to his private trust foundation run by various family members to be used for private weekend retreats at the Kennedy Klan Kompound.
What a frickin’ scumbag that lout was. Never was a man of principle and stupid Democrats were even defending that action on the Yahoo news comments.


33 posted on 05/14/2012 9:06:04 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama has cut and run from what he called "the right war".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: Sneakyuser

That made no sense to me. He’s a black man - that is all I got. Splain it to the non-frenchie speakers LOL


35 posted on 05/14/2012 9:12:45 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

It’s amazing. Smith was in one of the most conservative movies Hollywood ever made. And it was anti-taxation among other things.


36 posted on 05/14/2012 9:20:08 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

He’s a high earner, entitled to opine on his tax rate.


37 posted on 05/14/2012 9:20:38 PM PDT by kenavi (1% of the 1% were born in the 1%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sneakyuser
He's 'grateful' for being a lucky Black Man from America WHO NEVER WENT TO COLLEGE but will lecture all us little people but wants to change the reason the US is different.
38 posted on 05/14/2012 9:24:43 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Video is in some unintelligible dead language


39 posted on 05/14/2012 9:38:54 PM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I showed my young daughter this. She was also aghast at the 75% tax rate (proposed in France I think?). I had just done a search to refresh my memory with Reagan’s tax cuts. It had been 70% on the highest incomes, and he reduced it to 28%.

I asked her who are the richest people in America - not including movie stars, etc. (She’s 14).

“Uhm - people that work at Microsoft?”

“Well - yes! And the richest guy at Microsoft?”

“Bill Gates!”

“Right again - and why is Bill Gates the richest?”

“Cuz he owns the company?”

“Right. Many, if not most, of the really rich folks in America own or run companies. Now, instead of paying 70% to the government you are told to only pay 28%, what are you going to do?”

“Spend more!!!”

“That was part of it, and...??? (The following was with numerous “and”’s to lead her on:

“Work harder and earn more”
“Build more things”
“Hire more workers”

“Now - did the government over a period of time bring in MORE money by lowering the tax rate, or did it bring in LESS money.?”

“I want to say less, because they were only getting 30%. BUT, the rich were making more money, and more people were working and making more - so I want to say the government brought in more money.”

“Yes - it was MORE money going to government than before!”

“Dad - you should be President!”

“No - I’m just telling you everything that President Reagan had already done!”
“Inves


40 posted on 05/14/2012 10:06:42 PM PDT by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson