Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recon Dad
This post leads to the question of why more oil pipelines don’t run east to west?

Multiple reasons include the Rocky Mountains.

I think that the West Coast was self sufficient for a significantly long time. By the time they needed imports on the West side of the Rockies, they already needed them on east side as well.

There is not much incentive to transport imported oil from one coastline to another. They can just import their own.

9 posted on 05/08/2012 2:10:39 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: thackney
I do understand that in the case of the Baaken production the Rockies would be a major impediment and that California was at one time the number two oil state. But you could take a route out of Cushing or Texas and run south.

As to heading east I recently read that the east coast refineries were closing as much due to antiquated facilities as to the high cost of imports. If they could ship oil out of Houston it would be cheaper than the middle east oil they now use. (they can't due to the Jones Act) That begs the point why not a pipeline running either east from Chicago or the gulf.

Your insight is always appreciated.

10 posted on 05/08/2012 3:18:04 PM PDT by Recon Dad (Gas & Petroleum Junkie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson