Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

>>Pretty much you’re the only one out there saying it’s simple with no other stuff, out here in reality where people actually USE IT to successfully remove and keep gone 70 pounds (me) we understand that’s the quick way to say it but there’s a lot more to it.<<

Read the thread, lots of people are saying the same. And others in the Health industry that don’t have big lobbying groups.

You may think, calorie in/calorie out is shorthand. Talk to anorexics and bulimics. To them it’s set in stone. Sorry, I worked Psych. Unless one is seeing a nutritionist, “calorie in/calorie out” can be dangerous. Especially for young women.


83 posted on 05/08/2012 2:41:29 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Romney scares me. Obama is the freaking nightmare that is so bad you are afraid to go back to sleep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom

I’ve read the thread. You’re the only one saying it. Everybody understands there’s nutrition and metabolism and all that stuff.

I KNOW calories in/ out is a shorthand. Anorexics and bulimics are insane, so yes their integration with reality is flawed, and even they aren’t all calories in/ out, their problem lies in what they’re willing to do to not be fat and they’re thinking they are fat at all. I work out of psych with sane people that are frequently trying to drop pounds, they understand it’s a shorthand.


87 posted on 05/08/2012 2:49:25 PM PDT by discostu (I did it 35 minutes ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson