Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican (Michael Burgess R-Texas) to revive lightbulb war
The Hill ^ | 5/07/12 | Andrew Restuccia

Posted on 05/07/2012 4:09:16 PM PDT by Libloather

Republican to revive lightbulb war
By Andrew Restuccia - 05/07/12 04:43 PM ET

A House Republican is planning in the coming weeks to revive the GOP offensive against federal lightbulb efficiency standards.

Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Texas) will offer an amendment to Energy Department spending legislation that would block funding for implementation of the standards, the lawmaker's office told The Hill. The standards have come under fire from conservatives in recent years.

Republicans won the inclusion of a similar provision in an omnibus spending compromise that House and Senate lawmakers agreed to in December. The provision blocked funding for implementation of the law for fiscal year 2012. Burgess’ amendment would apply to fiscal year 2013.

Advocates of the law, including Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), have said the GOP provision blocking funding for implementation will have little effect.

Bingaman noted in December that lightbulb manufacturers have been working for years to make their products more efficient in anticipation of complying with the rules.

Republicans in Congress, joined by powerful conservatives like Rush Limbaugh, have spent months railing against provisions in a 2007 energy law that require traditional incandescent lightbulbs to be 30 percent more efficient starting in this year.

Opponents often describe the standards as a “lightbulb ban,” arguing that the rules would greatly restrict consumer choice by pushing out traditional incandescent bulbs in favor of more expensive, but more efficient, LED (light emitting diode) and CFL (compact fluorescent light) bulbs.

But the standards do not ban incandescent bulbs. They instead require them to be more efficient. While more efficient lightbulbs are often more expensive at the point of sale, experts note they save consumers money on their electricity bills over the long term.

The House Appropriations committee approved the Energy Department’s fiscal 2013 spending bill late last month. The legislation is expected to come up for a floor vote in the coming weeks.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigbother; bigbrother; burgess; greenieweenies; lightbulb; republican; socialistagenda; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Libloather
After that happens, somebody should do something about those federally-mandated low-flow toilets.

As soon as that is done, somebody needs to introduce legislation to tell the federal government to stay out of our sh!t, housing, gasoline, food,light, etc.

Their job is to defend the border and deliver the mail, and they won't even do that.

21 posted on 05/07/2012 5:34:32 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

Reminds me of the stupidity over our big toilets. Please someone stop the insanity —I hate CFLs and I hate my new tiny toilet, but it does flush pretty well.


22 posted on 05/07/2012 5:51:53 PM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Yet something else (among MANY) we have our former Compassionate Conservative RINO (BOOSH) to thank for, for not excercising his veto.


23 posted on 05/07/2012 6:05:09 PM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
"Not to worry, soon even more personal freedoms will be taken to resolve that situation created to save us from ourselves created by taking away personal freedoms."

Precisely. The government already regulates how fluorescent bulbs are disposed of in businesses - now they will claim the scope needs to be expanded to include private property. Next thing you know homeowners will be required to purchase a license to use the CFLs the government has forced us to use, and then have to pay some idiotic price to have them disposed of "properly" by a government-approved and licensed CFL Disposal Company. This shit sickens me.
24 posted on 05/07/2012 6:09:53 PM PDT by FortWorthPatriot (Obama is no Hitler; Hitler got the Olympics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953
If you break one of those thing you practically have to have a hazmat team come and do a clean up.

Don't be silly.
They contain less mercury than regular fluorescent lamps, and we have used trillions of them over the last 100 years, and continue to use them everywhere.

25 posted on 05/07/2012 6:33:25 PM PDT by publius911 (Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

While he’s at it, how about deregulating toilets, so we can have toilets that flush with just one flush?

Seriously, having to drive to Mexico just to get a working toilet is a drag.


26 posted on 05/07/2012 6:58:01 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“efficiency standards”

Fudge miners want government out of the bedroom and in the living room, bathroom, kitchen, porch et al.

The lightbulb police have no business dictating what size bulb I can buy nor are they permitted to affect my vision at home.

Fluorescent light is annoying on a subliminal level and not very healthy.


27 posted on 05/07/2012 7:04:18 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama has cut and run from what he called "the right war".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911
Have you read the clean up guide lines for these bulbs? And yes we have used florescent bulbs for years but most of that is not in your home.

1. Before cleanup •Have people and pets leave the room. •Air out the room for 5-10 minutes by opening a window or door to the outdoor environment. •Shut off the central forced air heating/air-conditioning (H&AC) system, if you have one. •Collect materials needed to clean up broken bulbs. 2. During cleanup •Be thorough in collecting broken glass and visible powder. •Place cleanup materials in a sealable container. 3. After cleanup •Promptly place all bulb debris and cleanup materials outdoors in a trash container or protected area until materials can be disposed of properly. Avoid leaving any bulb fragments or cleanup materials indoors. •For several hours, continue to air out the room where the bulb was broken and leave the H&AC system shut off.

28 posted on 05/07/2012 7:06:30 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Grammar & spelling maybe wrong, get over it, the world will not come to an end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: publius911; All
Don't be silly.

Don't be silly?? Do you think this is silly? The EPA doesn't.

29 posted on 05/07/2012 7:09:01 PM PDT by upchuck (Need is not an acceptable lifestyle choice; dependent is not a career. ~ Dr. Tim Nerenz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman
I’m surprised that congressmen in the northern states aren’t up in arms about this. Their constituents may actually need the heat!

That's no joke! In the dead of Winter, it's nice to be able to site at my desk with a flexible task lamp for both illumination and heat. It really takes the chill off.

30 posted on 05/07/2012 7:11:21 PM PDT by 6SJ7 (Meh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Some communities that switched their traffic lights to LEDs experienced problems with the light coverings icing over in winter because LEDs put out no heat.


31 posted on 05/07/2012 7:17:03 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama has cut and run from what he called "the right war".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

[ Some communities that switched their traffic lights to LEDs experienced problems with the light coverings icing over in winter because LEDs put out no heat. ]

Granted you could always make a light that has a heater element in it that would only kick on if it got too cold or something... But yeah, lack of proper usage of the lights.


32 posted on 05/07/2012 9:49:08 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bronzy
...the standards do not ban incandescent bulbs. They instead require them to be more efficient.

What isn't reported is that the efficiency required is beyond the performance envelope of the regular incandescent bulbs, so — effectively — the standard DOES, indeed, "ban" incandescent bulbs; beginning at the higher watt rated bulbs, and working its way down. The trusty 100Watt bulbs are already KIA, and you can bet your porch light the 60Watt bulbs are in the crosshairs already.

Burgess is doing the Lord's work, here; don't knock it.

33 posted on 05/08/2012 12:38:02 AM PDT by HKMk23 (GOPe 2012 MITT HAPPENS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
But the standards do not ban incandescent bulbs. They instead require them to be more efficient.

Somewhere George Orwell is smiling.

34 posted on 05/08/2012 1:03:30 AM PDT by denydenydeny (Admiration of absolute government is proportionate to the contempt one has for others.-Tocqueville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronzy
The dim bulb of congress - Rep. Michael Burgess.

You are the dim bulb!

Where does the United States of America get off defining light bulb efficiency? It is not the role of the government to arbitrate light-bulb efficiency!

35 posted on 05/08/2012 1:20:49 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
LOL. I thought he wanted to revive the curly cue.
36 posted on 05/08/2012 4:12:19 PM PDT by Bronzy (No more RINO's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bronzy
'Guess a flashlight and batteries will do until the son-in-law can visit.'

hahahahaha well just remember only screw balls use screw bulbs.....(not you, but eco wackos who dont know any better) Excelsior
37 posted on 05/09/2012 4:04:38 AM PDT by jimsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman

Yes and the incandescent heat benefit is research proven,
Canada, UK, Finland etc research
http://ceolas.net/#li6x

besides, any use with air conditioning cooling is optional, and might be preferred anyway, for light quality or other reasons


38 posted on 05/10/2012 8:50:04 AM PDT by lighthouse10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

An extensive referenced rundown of why the light bulb ban
makes no sense
http://dunday.com/p/deception-behind-banning-light-bulbs.html

- including to save energy
(a fraction of 1% of US energy saved, on referenced DoE data - and the same coal effectively gets burned at night regardless of light bulbs used, from the way coal power plants work)


39 posted on 05/10/2012 8:58:03 AM PDT by lighthouse10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronzy

Another take on that...
Supporting Michael Burgess new bulb bill amendment, and Answering the Critics:
“Typical of Un-Progressive Republicans to want to hang on to Horse and Buggy technology, rather than support Innovation!”, “How many Times do we have to Keep Saying it’s not a Ban!”, etc...
http://freedomlightbulb.blogspot.com/2012/05/bright-burgess-bulb-bill-block-part-2.html


40 posted on 05/11/2012 1:30:23 PM PDT by lighthouse10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson