Are you an ABO like me PO'd at JR for getting called a RINO? Truce declared! Please DONATE!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2879805/posts?q=1&;page=1#1 ^ | May 6, 2012 | Seizethecarp

[Seizethecarp]

Attention "Anyone But Obama" (ABO) FReepers! If you go to the thread at the link you will will see that JimRob has "declared a truce" and hundreds of ABO FReepers are now vigorously defending their belief, which I share, that the ineligible Marxist Manchurian MUST BE DEFEATED to preserve the Republic...without fear of "the ZOT"! Please consider a DONATION not just to fund renewal of expression and amplification of your ABO views, but let's over-achieve this FReepathon to get JR his new equipment!

IMO, Free Republic and FReepers could be vital in swing states in rallying just enough conservatives to tip the election and prevent our troops from having to salute for even one day longer than necessary an ineligible Marxist committed to destroying the USA !

[Mountain Mary]

Of course. And I am going to vote for POTUS too.

Working on helping get conservatives elected to office elsewhere. That’s my contribution.

Watch Mourdock/Lugar race tomorrow. Tea Party vs GOP-E.

[fml]

I'm sure you're not but others have been living in that cult and have gotten out and shared their experiences which you ridicule. If you want to be apathetic and ignorant towards Mormonism, fine but don't then try to defend this cult it against people who either lived it or have studied it.

Oh the drama. My word, you mean I missed some gut wretching mind blowing awful life some here have escaped only to be lucky to be alive and share the horrid facts about the abused they suffered? Pfffft

The truth is I know everything I need to know, and they are not threatening anyone's way of life. The bible thumping creeps here feel threatened by something they claim cannot touch them. It's ugly and casts all conservatives in a bad light.

[EnglishCon]

That race isn’t going to get a quarter inch squib on page 96 here - if a good thread is running on it can you ping me please?

[itsahoot]

I would like to offer my sincere THANK YOU for posting all of this. Shame on me for not researching this before now, I relied upon the good conservatives here and elsewhere, telling me that Romney was this or that, that Romney was pushing abortion and gay marriage.

Considering it was total B$, just how did it help you. Good grief read the replies to that post, it is completely debunked propaganda that Romney has been using to try and hide the true Mitt. Facts are such annoying things. The shame is you did not research it.

[Neoliberalnot]

I don’t think I have seen a single freeper that selected Romney as their first choice. I am a Newt Supporter, but to answer your question, let me make further comparisons between Romney and the Kenyan by asking you to consider the following questions:

Which candidate has a deep-seated, visceral hatred for America?

Which candidate has a similar hatred for White Americans?

Which candidate is not just a supporter of “gays”, but has exhibited such deviant behavior?

Which candidate is a closet Muslim?

Which candidate supports Muslim operations around the world?

Which candidate has a spouse that shares the same hatred?

Which candidate most hates free enterprise?

Which candidate has assigned his incompetent attorney general to attack the US citizens of Arizona for seeking to defend their borders against foreign criminals?

Which candidate has actually earned much of his way to the top of his field and which has had everything delivered in his lap because of his race?

Which candidate allies himself with marxist pigs, known terrorists, and open racists?

And finally, and most importantly, which candidate has a corrupt old media on his side and has a well-planned plot to divide his opposition by making sure his opponents split their ticket, thereby assuring his second term?

I will not fall for this demRAT-trap.

[AnTiw1]

“I am really tired of hearing the hatred spewed concerning other beliefs if different than some of these bigots.”

The poster of #957 ascribes the previous sentence as coming from me. I did not write this. ~A.~

"Some one need to start a "Muslims for Peace" thread. Oh never mind a two people ping list probably wouldn’t get many readers."

For whatever reason, the poster has tried to impress readers my position is 180 degrees from what it actually is.

FAIL.

[fml]

Good point, I was wondering why God would call on someone to be so rude.

Does anyone get to use that excuse?

[itsahoot]

it is the holier than though attitude from the bigots that offend me.

Unlike your own bigotry, which apparently is attitude free.

[Windflier]

Classic big talking keyboard commando making veiled threats that will never materialize. You're not leading or joining any mass protest in Tampa to disrupt the convention

Take a long walk off a short pier, coward.

Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

[itsahoot]

Either Jesus is the Savior, or He isn't. Either the Bible has given us an account of His Empty Tomb or it doesn't. If not then just make up your own version and that is OK with you? If so how would you feel about making up a new Constitution?

People can worship dog dung as far as I am concerned, but I sure don't want them in the White House.

[itsahoot]

My suggestion would be a policy of no bashing of any religion

How about religions made up by pedophiles, they OK too?

[ohioWfan]

People who through reason are not voting for that liberal called Romney are not demonic they are people who are tired of voting again for another liberal with a R by their name.

I never said, nor thought anything remotely like that.

I suggest that you put away your vivid imagination and start chewing on reality.

That's all I'm going to say to you.

(Other than also suggesting that you take a course in remedial reading and/or critical thinking skills).

[ohioWfan]

Have you ever studied the series, "Not a Fan," Colo?

It's about getting deeper and being a follower of Jesus Christ, and not just 'fanatic.'

There's a difference between arrogant anger and being a disciple of Christ. There's a difference between sharing Christ, and brow beating everyone who doesn't agree with your personal feelings.

Most true followers of Jesus Christ understand that difference.

btw, I didn't 'single out' anything. I was talking about religious threads in general and their contentious, irrational anger devoid of critical thought and true spirituality.

I don't go there. I stick with politics here, and devote myself to Christ in His Holy Word and in prayer, the fellowship of Believers and ministry.

Does that aid your confusion and grossly misplaced sarcasm?

[TigersEye]

I had not read (and once again, that is MY fault) that Romney was following the courts in all of this.

Don't blame anyone but yourself for ignoring the information I linked for you that contradicts that. He did not follow the courts. Under our system of government the governor is fully independent from the judiciary and is under no legal compulsion to enforce any judicial decision. Particularly an un-Constitutional decision that the legislature has not made law. The legislature does have the sole authority to write laws in our republic does it not?

[swpa_mom]

I really don’t think dems crossed over into our primaries. I think we collectively insulted,berated and told those not voting for “our” conservative that they were rinos or dumb. The firing squad worked. Anyone complaining now needs to just look at themselves. We either vote out obama or suffer the consequences. The party will not be taught a lesson, we should have learned that from 2008

[itsahoot]

I will vote for the candidate who will do the LEAST DAMAGE to what is left of my precious Republic!

My contention is that Romney will completely destroy the Conservative wing of the republican party, then it won't really matter whether the republicans or democrats are in power.

Note how Eric Cantor is encouraging democrats to vote for Lugar in Indiana's open primary.

When Michelle Bachman tried to defund ObamaCare after the TEA party gave the house to the GOP, the House Majority leader shut her down. Tell me again how the GOP will do less damage? Well I doubt they would actually set up a king, but like currently you can actually be a king with EO's until they are over ruled either by congress or the courts, or a new president who then becomes the new king.

[CatherineofAragon]

Since you pinged me, from what I understand, it was very bad back in 2007-2008. Diehard Romney supporters were quite a nasty bunch.

The GOP wanted Romney, and they got him-—thanks to their maneuvering of rules, their intention to set him up from the beginning as inevitable, and thanks to the idiots who voted for him in the primaries. The fact that Romney’s religion is being dissected should come as no surprise. It’s on a par with Scientology.

We didn’t vet the last guy to occupy the White House, and look what happened. I think people have a right to know about Romney’s religion. I agree that we have to stop tearing people apart. But that doesn’t have to happen if we use a little restraint.

[ohioWfan]

Oh, and btw, in case you didn't know...even posters in our sports-mad culture tend to be able to identify with sports analogies

Not sports analogies that have no parallel with anything being said in the conversation.

Sorry, Colo, but your post was bizarre and made no sense whatsoever. Even with your confused explanation, it's still pretty shaky...

But I'll give you a pass only because you knew the Tribe was in first place.

[CatherineofAragon]

"CatherineofAragon Since Oct 25, 2011"

I thought I heard my name called! ::::waving::::

[Colofornian]

btw, I didn't 'single out' anything. I was talking about religious threads in general and their contentious, irrational anger devoid of critical thought and true spirituality. I don't go there. I stick with politics here, and devote myself to Christ in His Holy Word and in prayer, the fellowship of Believers and ministry.

Well...hmm...I could have sworn you used the word "behavior" -- which goes beyond discussing "politics" -- which you now claim you "stick" to...

Which post am I to believe? This one...or the one where you're judging Elsie's "behavior?"

.Does that aid your confusion and grossly misplaced sarcasm?

Does that aid you in understanding why I am now confused -- that your previous post (to Elz) and your latest post (to me) doesn't match up...and why your previous post deserved some commentary?