Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MinorityRepublican

The average student gets nothing from football programs that remain sacrosanct despite tuition increases.

2 posted on 05/05/2012 6:28:55 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MinorityRepublican
The most recent example is the University of Maryland. The president there, Wallace D. Loh, late last year announced that eight varsity programs would be cut in order to produce a leaner athletic budget, a kindly way of saying that the school would rather save struggling football and basketball programs than keep varsity sports such as track and swimming, in which the vast majority of participants graduate.

So now we have class warfare against college football.

Well, football usually pays the bills for non-spectator sports. Get rid of football and watch others disappear.

I think the author is a miserable person.

8 posted on 05/05/2012 6:41:49 AM PDT by Gamecock (Celebrating 17,158 replies of dubious quality!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican
Look what happened to the University of Chicago. They dropped their football program (in the 1930s, I think), and they haven't won the Rose Bowl since.

Of course they had never won the Rose Bowl before that either.

On the other hand, Berkeley kept its football program, and they won the Rose Bowl as recently as 1938.

52 posted on 05/05/2012 8:36:40 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson