Posted on 05/05/2012 6:28:24 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
In more than 20 years I've spent studying the issue, I have yet to hear a convincing argument that college football has anything do with what is presumably the primary purpose of higher education: academics.
That's because college football has no academic purpose. Which is why it needs to be banned. A radical solution, yes. But necessary in today's times.
Football only provides the thickest layer of distraction in an atmosphere in which colleges and universities these days are all about distraction, nursing an obsession with the social well-being of students as opposed to the obsession that they are there for the vital and single purpose of learning as much as they can to compete in the brutal realities of the global economy.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Thanks for contributing something worth considering. Believe it or not, I am a gridiron football fan too.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/the_bonus/02/27/cfb.crime/index.html?eref=sihp"
You thought that was a clever response? How old are you, six?
I don't doubt that. And there are times and places for both. But a college is first and foremost an ACADEMIC institution, not a physical training camp, nor a foundry for forging fleshy war machines. Support football all you like; just don't do it in an environment where LEARNING is supposed to reign supreme.
For example, for every strategic brilliant General... you need the men with courage and physical athletic ability to carry out his plan and win a battle.
I agree. So train the generals in colleges and the ... athletes ... somewhere else. The two share very little. Why superimpose one on the other?
You were the one who ridiculed college athletes and demeaned them by referring to them as animals and unintelligent.
Which probably wasn't fair. In fact, some athletes are quite gifted intellectually. However, that doesn't bear at all on the reasoning behind putting football (and athletics) on college campuses.
Frankly, you bore me. You attempt to impress others with your so called intellect.
The boredom is probably the result of your own insecurity. And this is less about demonstrating my intellect than in soliciting a valid rebuttal to my assertion that football does not belong in a college environment.
What you dont see is that you are closed minded and jealous. Yes, jealous. Instead of seeing that people have different gifts and abilities, you demean those who arent just like you.
Yawn. The classic retreat of a cornered "victim." I don't necessarily pretend to be an intellectual, nor have I ever said I was not athletic. You have assumed that because I question college athletics, I must be some bow-tied Melvin with a shoulder-high wedgie.
Closed minded people are so transparent.
Yes, you are.
I admire the work ethic and athletic ability that athletes obtain. (whether that is football, swimming, soccer, whatever...).
What "ethic" would that be? Let's ask Charles Barkley or Dennis Rodman or Joe Paterno or Michael Vick or the baseball Steroid Bunch or the New Orleans Saints ...
Yeah. Ethics. Like Bill Clinton had ethics.
College football is bought and paid for. Ethics went out the window a long time ago, along with all that other Andy Hardy nonsense about honor and fair play. Today it's about winning. Winning means money. And money rules everything else.
I'm done with this thread. You can have the last word if you'd like.
After watching the Gators on offense last season, I'm inclined to agree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.