Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36

My question to you is OBVIOUSLY a problem.

How many types of citizenship, as a matter of fact, are mentioned in the U.S. Constitution?

How many types of U.S. citizen are there currently?

Where in the U.S. Constitution does it mention or make provisions for a different category?

Do you often interpret the clear meaning of the Constitution to include things that are not there?


62 posted on 05/04/2012 10:46:49 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
My question to you is OBVIOUSLY a problem.
Your questions aren't questions. They're implicatuions that I said something I didn't.

How many types of citizenship, as a matter of fact, are mentioned in the U.S. Constitution?
Why are you trying to use distraction instead of getting to the heart of the matter?
What makes someone a natural born citizen?

How many types of U.S. citizen are there currently?
How many citizen parents does a natural born citizen need?

Where in the U.S. Constitution does it mention or make provisions for a different category?
What relevance is your question in regards to how many citizen parents someone needs to be a natural born citizen?

66 posted on 05/04/2012 11:13:42 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: allmendream
Do you often interpret the clear meaning of the Constitution to include things that are not there?
I do believe that's your realm of expertise, not mine.
67 posted on 05/04/2012 11:16:07 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: allmendream; philman_36

allmendream

Saying something over and over and with different angles does not make it correct for me. Just twisting the question does not create a valid response either.

How do you explain the wording being different for the presidents qualification than other elected officials? You don’t accept this was a purposeful designation and purpose? This does not show a desire for more stringent rules for the highest office?

How does any of your argument help Obama, with a foreign father of record? Do you totally throw out the requirement for a child of citizen parents and believe the birthplace takes precedence?

Remember we only have forged instruments to even prove that for Obama. Have none of his actions as President made you question his total dedication to the US? Maybe the “old guys” knew what they were trying to protect us from?

36, FYI


68 posted on 05/04/2012 11:38:29 AM PDT by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson