To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
“Its the perspective.”
Normally, I would agree with you. Perspective in pictures and I don’t get along real well.
However, her head looks normal, why wouldn’t his? The picture looks like it was shot pretty much straight on by someone about the same height as 0 - if that is indeed him.
I also am not saying it’s real or faked, it just looks odd to me. Just like everything else that is associated with 0.
To: Larry - Moe and Curly
Seriously,
every photo from 0bama’s youth appears to be photoshopped.
Just something odd about every one of them - usually he or his head just appears too big.
60 posted on
05/02/2012 1:12:03 PM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: Larry - Moe and Curly; JennysCool
Of course, I was referring to the cropped photo -- in which it appears that the camera elevation is about a foot above Obama's head (I assumed the ground sloped up a bit.) That would be enough to create considerable foreshortening of the body. You can see this effect in most snapshots. The best way to avoid distortion by foreshortening, when photographing a standing person, is to hold the camera at about the level of the subject's waist.
Then along came JennysCool and post #103. That uncropped (less cropped) photo indicates that the camera was further back -- thus the foreshortening effect would have been less.
In summary:
Obama or Fauxbama
The jury's still out.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson