Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Erik Latranyi

They aren’t anti-hydrocarbon, they’re anti-energy (for the masses), and as a consequence, anti-freedom and anti-life.

They only support renewables because they AREN’T viable.
If they ever did become viable and cheap, they’d oppose those as well.


9 posted on 05/02/2012 6:41:36 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

“They only support renewables because they AREN’T viable.
If they ever did become viable and cheap, they’d oppose those as well”

Exactly! almost everywhere hydro power is considered a renewable energy supply; except in Washington State because there is an abundance of hydro power, therefore it is not considered part of of a shift to a renewable energy source.


18 posted on 05/02/2012 7:00:55 AM PDT by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country., Really! NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson