In WI a TP group, the WI Grandson of Liberty, compiled a database of all the people signing the recall (800k names). I wonder if such groups could compile a public database of registered voters or not. That would allow ordinary citizens to verify and challenge the validity of adresses as well as verification of dead people still on the rolls.
Dems also vote the living - the ones who don’t show up on election day.
James O’Keefe can catch them by putting up cameras in black districts in swing states... If 100 people go into vote - but the vote ‘count’ is 3,000+ - dems are voting the ‘stay at home’ vote...
All the voter fraud that matters will be in swing states. And most of the fraud in the swing states will be in Dem precincts in the big cities and inner suburbs. So efforts have to be concentrated in places like Las Vegas, Charlotte, NC, Columbus OH etc. African American areas will be real hotbeds of fraud. How many White conservative activists will be willing to works as poll watchers in the inner city? You know that Eric Holder is banking on this fact. If we can check voter rolls, we really need to focus on these areas.
Secretary of state, Secretary of State, SECRETARY OF STATE!!! Never overlook the secretary of state elections. The SOS is the single most important election official in virtually every state.
Ruth Johnson in Michigan is probably the single biggest win we got in 2010. She made a name for herself fighting ACORN fraud as a county commissioner in 08 and then took on the fake tea party scam and a hand picked Soros candidate, Jocelyn Benson in 2010.
I just got a new voter registration card the other day as a result of her purging the voter rolls.
when people come in to vote... fraudulently, there should be arrests and interrogations
why?
to get the organization behind them
those idiots didnt know the name to use. they were assigned the name.
GET THE ORGANIZATION BEHIND THIS BS ONCE AND FOR ALL
America is such a Banana Republic now... Well, its a Change, the one promise he kept.
Just volunteered. THANKS for this article.
Suppose that a great many smart phone-toting conservatives made it known that, on exiting the polls on voting day, they were going to take a geo-tagged picture of others standing in the vicinity of the polling location, and email that picture to a central email destination. Later, those pictures could be scanned through facial recognition software to detect cases of individuals voting at multiple locations. The process could be made more practical by only checking pictures that are taken within some limited distance of one another (thanks to geo-tagging).
Wouldn't such a plan give pause to anyone contemplating some forms of voter fraud?
Most fraud occurs in heavily Democratic precincts (usually no, or few, poll watchers. It might be good, got the purpose of enlightening the world to target a few precincts in Wisconsin in the upcoming “Walker recall and “flood the zone” there, to go through the records with a fine-tooth comb, including infiltrating the union organizations to catch, for example, out of state same-day registrants, and trace them back to Chicago, or whereever they came from. Follow the busses.
Have the New Black Panthers stand watch?
Wish I had known about this I would have tried to go today.
Only one way to fight voter fraud. Vote early and vote OFTEN.
One of my relatives who is a registered voter rarely votes.
But in 2004 she decided to vote and went to the polling place.
They refused to let her vote because a bogus absentee ballot had been submitted in her name.
The local Republican party sent a rep. to help her and they demanded she be permitted to contest the bogus absentee ballot and be allowed to submit a provisional ballot.
The rep told us this was a common ploy all over wherever there are democrats controlling the county clerks office. She said they run a data base search for registered voters who do not usually vote. Then they pass the list of names on to local democrats who submit bogus absentee ballots.
They do this early in the election process because the first vote submitted is the one that is assumed to be valid and is counted. Any subsequent ballots in the same name are not counted unless a challenge is entered and the conflict is investigated.
Of course the investigation is done by the same people who committed the original fraud.
Bump for later.
#1 if you’re in a union stop paying dues.