Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark; sickoflibs; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; stephenjohnbanker; fieldmarshaldj
Impy: Funny but a SCOTUS recess appointment would expire just like any other.

OneWingedShark: I’m not sure that’s the case

I assure you it is. Remember EVERY federal judge serves the same "during good Behavior" (aka lifetime unless impeached and removed) term, Supreme Court is not special in that regard.

46 posted on 04/26/2012 7:38:13 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Impy; OneWingedShark; sickoflibs; BillyBoy; stephenjohnbanker; fieldmarshaldj

A recess appointment to SCOTUS indeed would be exactly the same as for any other recess appointment. When John Jay resigned as Chief Justice in July 1795, the Senate was in recess, so President Washington made a recess appointment of John Rutledge (a former SCOTUS Justice) as the new Chief Justice. Rutledge served until he resigned in December of 1795 following the Senate’s rejection of his nomination; had Rutledge not resigned, his recess appointment would have expired anyhow on June 1, 1796 (when the Senate session ended). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_rutledge


51 posted on 04/26/2012 10:17:25 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson