Language, border, culture.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Schmuckie needs to tend to his knitting and get NYS straightened out.
2 posted on
04/24/2012 2:10:52 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: Oldeconomybuyer
It really scares me that NY keeps re-electing this ass-clown.
4 posted on
04/24/2012 2:13:13 PM PDT by
Drill Thrawl
(The United States of America, a banana republic since 1913)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The AZ law makes it illegal to be an illegal immigrant in the state of AZ.
That’s a “threat to democracy”?
shumer can stick it up his a@@.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This one’s liable to bite Chuckie in the azz and it couldn’t happen to a nicer POS.
6 posted on
04/24/2012 2:13:32 PM PDT by
MtBaldy
(If Obama is the answer, it must have been a really stupid question)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I’m sure it wouldn’t dawn on the likes of Schumer that the reason states pass these laws is because of willful malfeasance on the part of the federal government.
7 posted on
04/24/2012 2:15:51 PM PDT by
VR-21
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Typical grandstanding. Chuckie knows said bill would never get our of the Senate, and certainly not the House. Just playing to his base with meaningless gestures.
9 posted on
04/24/2012 2:16:48 PM PDT by
Hugin
("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Chucky’s dreaming about all the cameras that will be in front of him on this issue.
10 posted on
04/24/2012 2:17:53 PM PDT by
jazusamo
("Intellect is not wisdom" -- Thomas Sowell)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Since Arizona’s law is a duplicate of the federal immigration law, that could be problematical, ChuckYou.
11 posted on
04/24/2012 2:18:43 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If the SC says it is valid, would they not require an amendment to the Constitution to override it?
12 posted on
04/24/2012 2:18:49 PM PDT by
Ingtar
(When I donate to FR, it does not take the money and run as every politician I donate to does)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is nothing but hot air. Schumer’s proposed law would be shredded in the House.
14 posted on
04/24/2012 2:22:13 PM PDT by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I believe it is simply too damaging to our economy, and too dangerous to our democracy, to have 50 different states doing 50 different things with regard to immigration policy, Schumer said during opening remarks at a hearing Tuesday. Don't like States rights eh Chuck. By the way we are a Republic.
15 posted on
04/24/2012 2:23:23 PM PDT by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eat my dog!)
To: All
Sen. Charles Schumer promises action on Arizona immigration law Oh, please do, Sen. Schumer, please make state sovereignty an issue this election cycle. As wishy washy and mushy as the presumptive Republican nominee is on various issues, the only one he's been pretty steady on in that issue; he has to be, in order to defend Romenycare at all.
16 posted on
04/24/2012 2:23:48 PM PDT by
Turbo Pig
(...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“50 different states doing 50 different things”
While the federals do one thing: Nothing.
18 posted on
04/24/2012 2:27:03 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(Our new, happy lives.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
One more thing...this coming from the left who regularly loves it when the courts overturn issues in their favor, now they don’t like it? FO Chucky!
19 posted on
04/24/2012 2:27:08 PM PDT by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eat my dog!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Climb back in your slime pit Up-Chuck Schumer.
21 posted on
04/24/2012 2:31:23 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
It doesn't matter what Chuckie proposes.
It matters what gets passed and signed.
The the GOP House would not pass such a law...even IF Chuckie was able to break a filibuster in the Senate.
24 posted on
04/24/2012 2:45:15 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“Schumer said his proposal would prohibit states ... “
Another damned yankee who forgets the federal government was created by the states, not vice versa.
25 posted on
04/24/2012 2:47:56 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(Our new, happy lives.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I do not pretend to be a legal scholar, but could something like this be seen as a bill of attainder? And thus unconstitutional? Not that it has stopped them before...
27 posted on
04/24/2012 2:53:40 PM PDT by
cld51860
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Arizona, enforcing the Federal law the Federal government won’t enforce.
28 posted on
04/24/2012 2:54:41 PM PDT by
popdonnelly
(Socialism isn't going to work this time, either.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson