Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MARKUSPRIME

Those who vote for Mitt Romney in the primary are (perhaps unintentionally) giving the election to Obama. The issue in this election that people are as close to unanimous about as anybody ever gets is the need to get rid of Obamacare (which is just the federal verson of Romneycare).

We are shooting ourselves in the foot if we choose Romney as our candidate - partly because it will give Obama the victory even though I and many, many others will be pushing against Obama even if Romney is the R candidate. But also partly because Romney doesn’t really grasp the whole concept of freedom. I’m going to C&P from what I posted at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2875441/posts :

I have to work today and tomorrow so I can’t man any of Newt’s phone banks, but if anybody can use this letter to forward in e-mails to your lists before tomorrow’s primaries, please do so:

Mitt Romney supports government-coerced abortion. He personally has made the decision to force people to provide abortions even though they believe it to be murder.

Yes, he vetoed Romneycare because it mandated abortion insurance coverage, but in Dec 2005 after his veto was overridden and the Boston Globe printed an article noting that Catholic hospitals would be exempt from providing abortions to rape victims, Romney ordered the Dept of Public Health to force Catholic hospitals to provide abortions. He said his legal counsel had given him a “sounder view” of what Romneycare meant – that this law alone, of all the abortion laws passed in the 30 years since the 1975 conscience law had exempted religious institutions from having to perform abortions against their religious beliefs, nullified the conscience law even though a nullification clause had specifically been rejected by the MA legislature. Romney went further and said he personally believed it was the “right thing” for Catholic hospitals to commit what they believe to be murder.

Since that time, the regulations now say that the abortifacient morning-after pill must be offered by Catholic hospitals regardless of whether rape is even claimed. In other words, any woman can go to the emergency room of any Catholic hospital in MA and force the staff there to give her an abortion pill, no questions allowed to be asked.

This isn’t about rape and it isn’t about abortion. There are plenty of secular hospitals that will provide the morning-after pill. This is about forcing every Catholic in this country who puts a dollar bill in the collection plate to commune at the altar of government-established religion that includes abortion. Religious liberty exists no more.

Welcome to China right here in America.

Romney defends Romneycare’s coerced abortions by pointing out that states are not bound by the US Constitution. First Amendment guarantees of religious liberty don’t apply to states. States are free to establish religion and violate religious liberty, as Romney has done in MA.

The chief way that Islamists plan to establish sharia in free countries is by establishing precedents at the more local levels and then using that precedent to force the whole country into sharia – Islam forced onto everyone. Romney’s claims would allow states to establish sharia.

Vote for Newt Gingrich in the Republican Presidential primary.


263 posted on 04/23/2012 8:49:43 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

Already did in TN, but Im a realist if its Obama vs Romney Im voting for Romney. Obama has got to go.


264 posted on 04/23/2012 8:52:17 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson