Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vintage Freeper; Jim Robinson; Jeff Head; Cen-Tejas; sport; MWS; seekthetruth; Liz; ForGod'sSake; ..

>> “Prior to 1964, Ronald Reagan spent most of his life as a New Deal Democrat. Ronald Reagan changed.” <<

.
Prior to 1964 Ron Reagan worshipped Jesus Christ, THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD.

Clearly, Mitt Romney does not. He has zero idea who YHWH is, who Ye’shua is, and he worships himself. He won’t change any more than W changed; he is like W the second, and we cannot survive that.


11 posted on 04/19/2012 3:39:59 PM PDT by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

“Clearly, Mitt Romney does not. He has zero idea who YHWH is, who Ye’shua is, and he worships himself.”

are you confusing Romney with BO? talk about self- worshipping. clearly, our current dear leader is only a pseudo-Christian at best.

“He won’t change any more than W changed; he is like W the second, and we cannot survive that.”

and you think that America as we know it can survive another 4 years of BO? funny, if you look at where we were at the end of George W. Bush’s term and where we are near the end of BO’s first term, i will take Bush’s outcome over BO’s any day. God save America.


14 posted on 04/19/2012 3:54:43 PM PDT by IWONDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

INDEED.

. . . sigh.


16 posted on 04/19/2012 3:58:29 PM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
He won’t change any more than W changed; he is like W the second, and we cannot survive that.

W at least had a few core conservative values. I have seen none in Mitt.

17 posted on 04/19/2012 5:07:47 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

“he is like W the second, and we cannot survive that.”

I think you know the significance of my FReep handle. So I have a deep reason to disagree with you, but for another reason.

I look at W as parallel to the 7 year consulship of Marius, a proto-socialist whose policies badly degraded the Roman republic so that only a dictator could control all the INTENTIONALLY divided interests, particularly the deliberately increased number’s dependent upon the government providing for them.

In my view W was Marius lite, Bummer is Marius intense, and Bumney will be Marius consolidated. If there IS a Sulla who arises to defeat out all the principles and cronies in this fascist/Statist/Globalist cadre, he will not bring back the American republic in anything you or I wish it to be. He’d almost certainly be part of the plan of the Incrementalists who’ve insisted upon being called “Progressives” for over 100 years.

I am not completely disagreeing with you. Just consider all 3 — W, O, and R — as front men for the dismantling of constitutional limits on power.

Needless to say I’ve more analysis to back up this short synopsis. I don’t yet know what can be done about it outside of prayer. That was something the ancient roman republicans did not have as part of their culture because there were yet no Christianity.


23 posted on 04/20/2012 10:49:34 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (How humanitarian are "leaders" who back Malthusian, Utilitarian & Green nutcases?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson