Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muir_redwoods
It is possible to want to conserve the economic liberty the Founders provided and thereby be a conservative.

The Soviets in Russia around 20 years ago could also have been called "conservative." The problem is that the word conservative has no well-defined meaning.

It would be more accurate if conservatives defined themselves in more concrete terms, such as saying that they support Christian society and morals or free enterprise economics or foreign policy interventionism, instead of the more vague terms like "social conservative," "fiscal conservative," and "foreign policy conservative."

6 posted on 04/17/2012 2:31:41 PM PDT by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: WPaCon

What you just called in your reply - “vague terms like “social conservative,” “fiscal conservative,” and “foreign policy conservative.” the Russel Kirk article you posted calls “the cultural conservatives, the libertarians, the neo-conservatives “

The question before us right now is, will these three be able to unite to stop the progressive republican who is seemingly cruising toward the 2012 presidential nomination?


7 posted on 04/17/2012 2:44:49 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: WPaCon

The actual correct terms, generally, are these

Today’s Conservative - Classic Liberal or 19th Century Liberal
Today’s Liberal - Socialist or Social Democrat at best

A true Conservative would be a supporter of monarchy and clericalism, think 19th Century Austria-Hungary.


8 posted on 04/17/2012 3:25:28 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson