Replies

I believe it would be unconstitutional for the state to force its citizens to enter into private contracts against their will simply for simply living within a state. I might understand requiring liability insurance if you wish to register and drive a car within a state, but compulsory health insurance just to live in the state? This would be a direct violation of their 4th amendment right to be secure in their homes, papers and private affairs if nothing else.

Definitely a violation of the founding principles and of our inalienable God-given rights to individual liberty and right to self-rule and economic freedom (pursuit of happiness). It’s clear to see that Romney cares no more about individual sovereignty or conservatism or Liberty than does Obama!!

Ronald Reagan on RomneyCare (compulsory health insurance) and the elites (Romney) introducing socialism into America via compulsory health insurance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRdLpem-AAs

Don't get me wrong. I think the Founders would roll over in their graves at something like the imposition of RomneyCare, but here I think we are in a position much like the liberals who think they can ban me from doing whatever I might want to do with nuclear weapons (and shotguns too). If we and they don't like it then we have to get a Constitutional Amendment legally ratified and added to the Constitution. Anything else is intellectually dishonest, IMHO.

ML/NJ