[SoConPubbie]

From the article . . . . .
But as any New Jersey conservative activist will attest, Christie isn’t a conservative and never has been. He ran his gubernatorial race as a moderate and won by defeating two conservatives. On the issue of gun control, global warming, immigration, gay rights, taxes, and many other issues, he’s a RINO. But apparently, Coulter thinks he’s a conservative because he talks tough to the media during press conferences. What a standard. Coulter loves to rip liberals up for not having their facts straight but when it comes to certain male politicians, she allows her crushes to get in the way of reality.
And the Un-Masking of Mitt Romney, the left-wing, Progressive Liberal, continues . . .
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton

[Sopater]

Please, Ann. Set the cup down and slowly step away from the koolaid.

[Little Ray]

I think her greatest moment was the Coulter Doctrine for the War on Terror:

Invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity.

If we’d followed this, things would have probably turned out better (for us...).

[TMA62]

The problem with Coulter as well as with people like Neal Bortz is that they look at anyone who has an “R” next to their name is good and anyone with a “D” next to their name is bad. The problem is that many republicans who have positions on issues that are no better that those of democrats. We call them RINO’s but Coulter, Bortz, et al. see no difference.

[Sybeck1]

Wonder who will win MA in the general? Mitt or Barack? Barack of course.

[voicereason]

Why would I (a conservative) be surprised that Coulter would support RomneyCare. I never considered Coulter to be conservative, just someone who was riding a wave. Hence, I never considered her opinion to be worthwhile, nor have I have I ever purchased any of her books due to that same reason.

[fishtank]

SISTER WIVES: Coulter wants to know more.

Pro-Abortion Basturd (sic) Rmoney 2002 YouTube video

Willard McBush WANTS polygamy in the afterlife. It makes him no different from practicing it NOW.

[LibLieSlayer]

ann is a socialist and that is all that there is to it.

LLS

[fishtank]

SISTER WIVES: Coulter wants to know more.

Pro-Abortion Basturd (sic) Rmoney 2002 YouTube video

Willard McBush WANTS polygamy in the afterlife. It makes him no different from practicing it NOW.

[Daveinyork]

Lately, I’ve been reading Ann whenever I feel my blood pressure getting dangerously low. She cures it immediately.

[Lazlo in PA]

I think we know about as much as we need to know about how Conservative GOProud Ann really is.

[Don Corleone]

Annie’s march through menopause must have really scrambled her mental whore moans. /sarc

[freekitty]

What has happened to her?

[lowbridge]

Bump

[Vineyard]

A “side note” on how a conservative could support an individual mandate.

Step 1 - Congress repeals the 1980’s laws that requires Hospitals/Emergency Rooms that they must treat everyone, regardless of their ability to pay. If someone shows up in the ER - the ER must stabilize...and assess the ability of the person to pay for treatment. (If the individual has no coverage and there is no charitable organization willing to cover treatment, the ER can turn the individual out with not further treatment.)

Step 2 - Congress passes a “mandate” that people need to buy an insurance policy that covers low risk/high cost procedures, emergency medical treatment due to accidents, etc. No coverage - no treatment. There would be no efforts to track down to see if people have coverage - if they don’t have coverage and need treatment and they can’t pay for it (and no family or church or ?? will guarantee the coverage) - then - too bad - no treatment.

Step 3 - Congress mandates that hospitals/doctors not engage in cost-shifting. Everyone should be charged the same, regardless of payment out of pocket or payment by 3rd party insurance. Perhaps some minor discounts for prompt pay, volume discounts, etc. - but the goal should be to stop charging individuals 2 to 3 times what an insurance company is billed for the same procedure.

Imagine if gas stations had the same policy - you pump first, and when you pay, you are charged based on information available about you ....some might pay $10/gallon, while others pay $3/gallon, while Juan goes in and pumps gas and drives away, not having to pay anything! It is blatantly wrong to do this!

Now - am I for an individual mandate - YES - if described above.

When states mandate that insurance companies must include all sorts of “boutique” treatments that are unrelated to what insurance is about - I am disgusted that it should be un-Constitutional at the state level. When states mandate that insurance coverage should be offered with no exclusions for pre-existing conditions - again, I am outraged. How about a “super surcharge” that elevates the cost of insurance for 5 years or so to anyone who didn’t have coverage or dropped coverage - so that the insurance company can re-coup costs from the person who tried to game the system.

There are conservative approaches to fix the health care system ...I just don’t see them being discussed.

[Lee'sGhost]

All true.

I don’t get Ann and her liberal fetish for Romney/Christie. You could both of them together and they still wouldn’t make a conservative. It’s like everything she said previously was a lie.

And I really like Ann Coulter...or did.

[getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL]

My feeling, that explains it all for me, is that Ann has an undetected brain tumor.

[Smokin' Joe]

Recall, Ann did the speech at the homo convention a while back.

Face it, Obamacare, Romneycare, isn't about getting grandma a heart bypass operation, it's about (us) paying for the extended care of AIDS and HIV positive patients, and hiding the expenses in with the skinned knees and banged up elbows...