The conservative movement should not use litmus tests.
The homosexual agenda is not compatible with conservatism.
That's just stupid.
1854, abolititionists formed the Republican Party.
I use a litmus test against slavery. I don't like it. Then, or now, like the arabs in Somalia practice it, or the arabs in Saudi Arabia.
I use a litmus test against killing babies. Whether unborn (or, more recently) actually born. I consider that evil.
I use a litmus test to determine whether or not a candidate supports my God-given right to self defense.
Get over it. Your position is as liberal as the DNC.
/johnny
“The conservative movement should not use litmus tests”
How ‘bout this “litmus test”. YOU MUST NOT BE A LIBERAL SOCIALIST!!!!
Is that easy enough for you?
So lets all vote for Stalin because he can win!!
Asking for a conservative to vote for a non-conservative and saying its still a conservative movement is dumb. It is stupid. It would no longer be a conservative movement.
I don’t mind litmus tests, we need to know where people are on issues. I just think calling people idiots and assmunchers and “eff you” isn’t really going to get people to do more investigating and possibly changing their minds on someone.
Pure, unadulterated, hypnotic, Kool-Aid speak.
Translation: The conservative movement should abandon all principles and join the Socialist Borg.
Pardon, if I don't join you in the warm sticky blackness you've chosen to inhabit.
It's more like you don't tell conservatives what we should do! We aren't the anything goes like liberals which is Newt's base.
And tell that to your PRO HOMO, PRO baby killing, anti-traditional marriage, liberal judge appointing, big gov't socialistic healthcare guru, bottom rated governor candidate - he ain't getting our vote. Let him stutter on that for awhile. He paid off enough lackeys to vote for him and to cover him since the debates started.