Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JediJones
Just a few examples out of hundreds:
What about When Obama puts 3 more hard core communists on the Supreme court like his Kagan that will replace 3 conservatives? then the Supreme court will be hard core communist for decades. what is worth that?

What about When Obama puts hundreds more hard core communists on the federal courts like his Kagan that will replace conservatives?

What about as Obama said he will have more flexibility because he doesn't face reelection, more flexibility to

disarm America, take away our missile defense, nukes and right to bear arms among hundreds of other liberty robbing acts this marxist/democrat Obama will do?

More flexibility to get his czars to turn the U.S. into a socialist state, censor the Internet with the FCC, censor the Internet with ACTA, get the UN to tax Americans, get the UN to take away our guns and sovereignty?

More flexibility for Obama to pile trillions more in debt on us, grow government size and power, cripple our industries, crippple America's energy production (Oil and coal etc.), to let in more illegals, Amnesty for illegals, free healthcare for illegals,more immigration, more HB1 visas, send our jobs to China etc.

This is just off the top of my head . But if i researched it I could go on for many more of pages but what's the point? We are done.

1,379 posted on 04/14/2012 3:39:39 AM PDT by rurgan (Make all laws have an expiration date of 3 years. too many laws is the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: rurgan

Yes, it will be awful to fall under a soviet-style dictatorship. Therefore we should adopt the same ends-justifies-the-means reasoning that drives the left. That is your argument. Remember the book 1984, where Orwell’s hero finally succumbs to his fears, his basic instinct for physical survival, and professes his love for Big Brother. In rough terms, that is where we are. The would-be tyrants of the left have planned all along to limit our political choices to only those candidates that support their objectives. It is called the Hegellian Dialectic, though Beck has tried recently to popularize it as the so-called Overton Window. Our current dilemma is just such a construct, a designer crisis, if you will, and a manipulation of the most brazen and insidious sort. See how it equip people like you to use fear and guilt to wrench people like us from voting our principles. But will it really be our fault if,in this one last election cycle, we as a nation sell out our founders and surrender to despotism? No. We reject the manipulation. The guilt belongs elsewhere than on the shoulders of those who reject crypto-leftists as the great stop-gap savior of conservatives. The blame belongs with those who sell their principles a little at a time, just to buy another day of survival. This is the moment for drawing a line in the sand and saying thus far, but no farther. There may be no better time than now to take that stand. This may be our Alamo. I hope future generations find in us that same measure of courage.


1,415 posted on 04/14/2012 6:34:12 AM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson