>>>I agree with all you said. Furthermore...if it was Tryvon screaming likw hia mother said, why did his father say it was not Trayvon on the tape?...<<<
Also, if she heard her son screaming for his life on the tapes, why did she say yesterday that the shooting was “an accident”.
At first I thought her “accident” comment would be irrelevant in court, but now that I see that the prosecution is using her as a key “witness”, that comment and her later retraction could undermine her credibility, as does the fact that she has been seeking to cash in on her son’s death by trademarking “Justice for Trayvon” and “I am Trayvon Martin”.
While on the subject of the screams on the 911 tapes, I find it curious that the prosecution cited the mother’s claim that it was Martin for a couple of reasons.
1) I had not previously heard that she identified the screams as TM’s. My guess is that the special prosecutor very recently had her listen to the tapes (after TM’s father said the screams were NOT Trayvon’s) and that she was either coached into claiming it was TM or knew that the claim would help her case.
2) Could they really find no expert in voice analysis to testify that the screams were Trayvon’s and not Zimmerman’s? The lack of such expert testimony makes me about 99.9% sure that the screams were clearly Zimmerman’s and that this will be proven.
It is not difficult to dig up a paid “expert” witness to testify to just about anything, unless they know such testimony could be conclusively proven false, putting the “expert” in danger of perjury charges.
You won't find an honest one that could claim either way. They need more than a screech heard from a distance through an iffy cell phone microphone to have any level of confidence, plus a number of samples of similar "speech" from both parties.