Oblivious to the Obvious

American Thinker ^ | April 10, 2012 | Nick Chase

[matt1]

Is Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate a forgery? Definitely yes, for those of us who have spent a lifetime writing and producing technical documents, and who remember how they were produced in pre-computer days, and who have the technical expertise today to produce them using computers. For us, it's been an "open secret" that the document image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 is a complete fake.

[matt1]

congrats to American Thinker. they seem to be seriously taking on this crime perpetrated on the American public on a regular basis.

[RightOnline]

Yes, a HUGE crime and unbelievable fraud.....that no Congressman, presidential candidate, or major on-air personality will touch with a ten-foot pole.

Amazing what passes for “gonads” these days.

[Balata]

...the forgery fails the "pitch test." ...(In other words, the test is simple enough that even a dumbass journalist can understand it.) This pitch test works even with the Obama T-shirt!

LOL! This is a great non-technical proof that Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate a forgery.

What may be more important is this article answers all the objections libs have about the "Birther" issue.

This article is a keeper!

Thanks for posting.

[No One Special]

The author’s website is well worth a visit.

There’s alot of info on the issue.

Check out the March 26, 2012 entry on this page:

http://contrariansview.org/Site/About_Me.html

[tophat9000]

Look this does not make sense

...If you want to the a forgery right you forage a real piece of paper then make a pdf of that paper... these people have the ability to do that...they have the ability and power to have the best forgeries done in the world now...

If it is some cheap cobbled together photo shop then it a sound like people are being baited

[RetSignman]

[If it is some cheap cobbled together photo shop then it a sound like people are being baited]

Thank YOU, I’ve been saying this for years...it’s what is going to used in this election cycle.

‘Their’ hopes and dreams will be realized if Congress starts an investigation.

[Apple Pan Dowdy]

So, are you two saying that since the forgery was so unprofessionally done that is has to be just a “bait” not an actual illegal punishable act of forgery?

With that rationale we would then have to also say that if a really stupid gang robbed a bank, but bungled the robbery with obvious unprofessional mistakes, even accidentally killed a bunch of bystanders because they didn’t know how to use the guns they carried..... then the whole robbery must just be a “bait” and we would not want to hold them responsible for it or look into it too seriously. After all, they might just produce evidence that they are all legally insane, thus not responsible for their actions.

Even if the president should one day produce a “real” birth certificate, does that relieve him of the criminal act of forgery? Is he so above the law. Do we even have a rule of law anymore?

[tophat9000]

You missing the point ...

In war it is an old tactic to bait you opponent by making what looks to be an error....

It is foolish to just assume you opponent is that stupid and just bite....

That is the very definition of a trap....

You do you best to hide your real vulnerable area with fake vulnerable area... you also lures your opponent with the same fakery...

They are either really really dumb or really really smart, or just so arrogant they just don't dam care....

Any way you look at it need to know before you go all in

To win you have to get inside their decision curve...

I'm here to win