White House has diverted $500M to IRS to implement healthcare law (Commiecare™ = Solyndra?)

The Hill ^ | 4/09/12 | Sam Baker

[Libloather]

...throwing people in jail because they don’t have insurance.

That $500mil is to cover 'free' bail - no?

[grobdriver]

So much for having control over “the purse strings”.

[maddog55]

[Eye of Unk]

Communism is worse than herpes, cancer and having islamic parents all combined.

This is communism period designed to instill fear and servitude through its enforcers the IRS.

If they want a nationwide mob it will start when the IRS starts arresting protesters.

[panaxanax]

“...throwing people in jail because they don’t have insurance.”

Not to mention that it ain’t cheap having your own fully-armed SWAT TEAM!

[Eye of Unk]

(0bama >>WORST PRESIDENT EVER.)

I would say Obama is the worst FAKE President ever myself.

[Jacquerie]

If Bam gets his way with the Supreme Court, his promised transformation will be near completion. The other two branches of government will be de facto reduced to either rubber stamping his requests or he will administratively rule without them.

Either way, we have allowed our once representative republic to dive headlong into tyranny.

[Yosemitest]

As someone recently reminded me, and I quote:

"For many deceivers are entered into the world, ...
he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds..."

Let's battle this evil together, including the evil of the "Establishment Republicans".

Let's remember that the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT IN CHIEF, Barack Hussein Obama II is a Fascist, a Fabian Socialist.
We need to remind people just how dangerous Fascist are, their crimes and their hand in the start of World War I and World War II.

Watch and read MUST WATCH: C-Span Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL) Exposes Obama's $100B Plus $260 Billon Social Security Trust Fund Cut.
Then let's remember:

Only idiots and the evil vote for Obama.
It's not our fault that DEMOCRATS raided the Social Secureity Trust Fund.

Let's remember ...

Oh, and for the record...


Not ALL are to blame for the empty lock box.

It's the Democrats Communists.

Let's take a deeper look.

Obama: "I Don't Want the Folks who Created the Mess to do a lot of Talking" "

Okay, then the DEMOCRATS need to shut up!!!




Lets review:
Who was it that cut future funding for Medicare by $575 billion?

...the president and the Democratic Party successfully bamboozle voters... The 2012 election could turn on this falsehood.
The truth is that the Obama health law reduces future funding for Medicare by $575 billion over the next 10 years ...

Mr. Obama and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius frequently make that false claim.
Indeed, even Medicare's mailings to seniors repeat the claim that reducing spending on Medicare will make it more financially secure for future years.
The fact is that Mr. Obama's law raids Medicare.

Who was it that moved Medicare Trust Funds out of the "trust box" and into the General Revenue, replacing them with Government I.O.U.s?
"In early 1968 President Lyndon Johnson [DEMOCRAT] made a change in the budget presentation by including Social Security and all other trust funds in a"unified budget." "

Who was it that expanded Medicare and Medicaid to cover many, many more people than it was originally designed to cover?

The History of Medicare

In 1965, the Social Security Act established both Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare was a responsibility of the Social Security Administration (SSA), while Federal assistance to the State Medicaid programs was administered by the Social and Rehabilitation Service (SRS). SSA and SRS were agencies in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW). In 1977, the Health Care Financing Administration was created under HEW to effectively coordinate Medicare and Medicaid. In 1980 HEW was divided into the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The first U.S. President to propose a prepaid health insurance plan was Harry S. Truman [DEMOCRAT]. On November 19, 1945, in a special message to Congress, President Truman outlined a comprehensive, prepaid medical insurance plan for all people through the Social Security system. The plan included doctors and hospitals, and nursing, laboratory, and dental services; it was dubbed "National Health Insurance." Furthermore, medical insurance benefits for needy people were to be financed from Federal revenues.

Over the years, lawmakers narrowed the field of health insurance recipients largely to social security beneficiaries. A national survey found that only 56 percent of those 65 years of age or older had health insurance. President John F. Kennedy [DEMOCRAT] pressed legislators for health insurance for the aged. However, it wasn't until 1965 that President Lyndon B. Johnson signed H.R. 6675 (The Social Security Act of 1965; PL 89-97) to provide health insurance for the elderly and the poor.

On July 30, 1965, President Johnson signed the Medicare and Medicaid Bill (Title XVIII and Title XIX of the Social Security Act) in Independence, Missouri in the presence of former President Truman, who received the first Medicare card at the ceremony; Lady Bird Johnson, Vice-President Hubert Humphrey, and Mrs. Truman also were present. President Johnson remarked: "We marvel not simply at the passage of this Bill but that it took so many years to pass it."

Medicare extended health coverage to almost all Americans aged 65 or older. About 19 million beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare in the first year of the program. Medicaid provided access to health care services for certain low-income persons and expanded the existing Federal-State welfare structure that assisted the poor.

The 1972 Social Security Amendments expanded Medicare to provide coverage to two additional high risk groups disabled persons receiving cash benefits for 24 months under the social security program and persons suffering from end-stage renal disease.

...(continued at link)
So Democrats,
YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE
FOR INSURING THE FAILURE
OF THE MEDICARE/MEDICAID PROGRAM,
and now YOU DEMOCRATS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INTENTIONAL DESTRUCTION OF THE U.S.A. ECONOMY!!!

So DEMOCRATS ... SHUT UP!!!

You have no integrity!!!

Sen Mark Kirk's statement Thursday, Dec 1, 2011 ...

"There are 55 million Social Security beneficiaries that will see little or no extra cash from this 2012 tax holiday; instead, the dedicated payroll contributions meant to pay for future benefits are being diverted from the Trust Fund
and replaced with Treasury debt that does not even have a AAA credit rating.
Social Security was designed to be independent and free from the danger of Congressional manipulation,
and maintaining the firewall between the Social Security Trust Fund and general government funding is the best way to maintain the solvency of this important program.
Neither bill protects the Social Security Trust Fund
so I voted no. "

[TPOOH]

Marxist dictators....they just keep going, and going, .....

[rockinqsranch]

bflr

[Fireone]

450,000,000 rounds of .40 HST anyone?

[bert]

The illegally paid salaries must be reimbursed by the workers holding the jobs.

[panaxanax]

Agree!

He is the “WORST” at so many levels.

[the invisib1e hand]

I trust that the great untold story of the obama administration is the looting of the American people.

[know-the-law]

sfl

[Ronin]

Succinctly put. And that’s about the size of it.

[traditional1]

As I've said; the USSC will NOT strike down all of Obamacare, because so much has been spent already, thousands of idle staffers and beaurocratic lackys would be sitting idle (government workers are NEVER eliminated from the payroll, aka, the public dole, just because they have nothing to do).

The un-winding/de-funding would not result in reduced numbers of government employees, Czars, or IRS employee reductions, period.

Once in place, the machinery is NEVER totally un-done, for ANY government/taxpayer-paid program.

[mo]

“I trust that the great untold story of the obama administration is the looting of the American people.”

It’s been a bipartisan looting of the American Treasury ...and we are about to see the violence that will be required to deal with the consequences.

[PGalt]

Who are domestic enemies of a “free” republic?

“Thus, when plunder is organized by law for the profit of those who make the law, all the plundered classes try somehow to enter — by peaceful or revolutionary means — into the making of laws. According to their degree of enlightenment, these plundered classes may propose one of two entirely different purposes when they attempt to attain political power: Either they may wish to stop lawful plunder, or they may wish to share in it.”

“Woe to the nation when this latter purpose prevails among the mass victims of lawful plunder when they, in turn, seize the power to make laws!”

“It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.”

“Now, legal plunder can be committed in an infinite number of ways. Thus we have an infinite number of plans for organizing it: tariffs, protection, benefits, subsidies, encouragements, progressive taxation, public schools, guaranteed jobs, guaranteed profits, minimum wages, a right to relief, a right to the tools of labor, free credit, and so on, and so on. All these plans as a whole — with their common aim of legal plunder — constitute socialism.”

“Above all, if you wish to be strong, begin by rooting out every particle of socialism that may have crept into your legislation. This will be no light task.”

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

Socialists/radical socialists/totalitarians...they not only plunder, they slaughter.

[rockinqsranch]

Your post IMO is absolutely right on the mark. This is why Obama is pushing the envelope to get all the precedence set that he can before any ruling by the SCOTUS.

History shows us that precedence is almost impossible to break in our government. Getting enough representative agreement in our Congress to breaking an established precedent is like trying to herd cats.

It would take one “H” of a strong political personality to wrench enough arms, and persuade enough people even with a friendly Congress to toss years of Leftist accumulation of influence in our government. It appears we aren’t going to get that “personality” this go around.