It is pathetic that the standard for truth on FR has become...
"Prove it didn't happen --- if you can't, it must be true."
This is insane, just about every case before a jury is conjecture and circumstantial. Zimmerman is innocent until proven otherwise. There is circumstantial and physical evidence, plenty of it that points to his innocence. None of it points to his guilt. If it went to a court of law with no new evidence (as it stands now), Zimmerman would walk, no if ands or buts. Everything presented points to his innocence.