[freedomlover]

How long ‘til “bullet” is removed from liberal lexicon as verboten?

[Clara Lou]

If Sheila is for it, I’m agin’ it.

[kjo]

A 16 trillion dollar debt...and these fools are talking about more spending for projects to help the unions and local contractors to steal more federal dough.

Nuts.

[evets]

Moonbat... send her to Mars.

[Wizdum]

When SJL gets on a bullet train, it moves at toy train speed.

[Errant]

Dang, I didn’t know there was an ammunition shortage in Dallas...

[TSgt]

must...not...comment...

[TexasCajun]

Why? Southwest airlines have great round-trip rates.

[Cicero]

Strap a rocket on her back. Much faster and much cheaper.

[mnehring]

Its called American Eagle.

[SpaceBar]

Evidently a memo has been circulated amongst the dems that the best way to bring the country to its fiscal knees is to promote astronomically expensive feel-good boondoggle projects that will forever be a ball and chain around the ankles of the happless taxpayers financing their own ruin.

[Buckeye McFrog]

in my experience, no one from Dallas ever wants to go to Houston.

[Arcy]

Actually, She’s only asking for the train. Houston has plenty of flying bullets!

[from occupied ga]

This from the moron who thought that US astronauts landed on Mars

[Harley]

Bullet train? She ought to be pressing for a brain transplant for herself. Her IQ is so low it’s not measurable.

[Tex-Con-Man]

I’m all for it...but not with taxpayer’s money.

[hattend]

WTF is it with libs and High Speed Trains?

[Kandy Atz]

We already have a bullet train between Dallas and Houston, and several other cities in Texas. It is called Southwest Airlines, a private, and for now, profitable enterprise. I think they run about 25 flights a day, with about an hour flight time.

SJL, please explain why taxpayers need to waste money and seize private property, to build a gubmint choo choo that nobody will ride? I think a better use of taxpayer money is to invest it in solar power. I hear that the ROI is very strong in green energy.

[servo1969]

I’ve said this before but it needs repeating - What is it about high speed rail and progressives? When has a large segment of the public ever demanded more high speed rail? And yet time and time again the subject comes up.

Why?

Yes, I know- unions and cronyism and so forth. But still, it does seem to hold some fascination with progressives. As if it’s an integral part of some master plan. Sooner or later it’s always there.

[WayneM]

I hear she’s doing much of the design and engineering work herself!