[throwback]

Nobody has the time to rebut the whole thing, but here's one. He makes a special point of calling Santorum a liar repeatedly. You try to read the piece where Santorum said X but the author clearly shows that it was not X. I just have a hard time finding these so called “lies” that he claims. Take for the example Santorum says his charitable giving is low because his family is expensive, especially his daughter's care. Well the author claims that is a “lie” because his giving was low before his daughter. How does he know what his cash flow has been? Unless he knows what all of his earnings and expenses are, he doesn't. It's interesting to me that he claims this lie based on the Wallace hit piece before super Tuesday also. Looks to me to be another Repub establishment team player.

[Clara Lou]

I'd say that the "lie" you mention is the least significant of the "lies" listed. Regardless, Santorum gave about 2% before his daughter was born and about 2% after she was born. Maybe it's just good old fashioned hypocrisy:
Bowyer does have a point when he says, I’m not all for people who live in a house which is almost ten times the national average value (Santorum) saying they are too poor to give away a significant portion of their income. This is especially hard to take from someone who wears his religion so prominently on his sleeve, announcing in one of his speeches that we ‘need a Jesus candidate’ with reference to his own candidacy.