Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lacey

If you don’t have the facts, argue the law.
If you don’t have the law, argue the facts.
If you don’t have the facts or the law, abuse the plaintiff/defendant.


25 posted on 04/05/2012 8:04:55 AM PDT by tumblindice (our new, happy lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tumblindice
It goes a little bit differently in military court ...

If you don't have the facts, argue the law.
If you don't have the law, argue the facts.
If you don't have the facts or the law, pound on the table and accuse the commanders of being unfeeling and unfair.

26 posted on 04/05/2012 8:07:57 AM PDT by BlueLancer ("No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full" (Sulla))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: tumblindice
We used to have a civilian counsel who would represent soldiers in military courts who had a standard argument whenever he made an objection or a motion against evidence or a witness' testimony ...

Judge: "Do you have a basis for your objection/motion, counsel?

Civilian attorney: "Well, Your Honor, it just tain't fair ... tain't fair at all ...

28 posted on 04/05/2012 8:10:11 AM PDT by BlueLancer ("No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full" (Sulla))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson