To: Lacey
If you don’t have the facts, argue the law.
If you don’t have the law, argue the facts.
If you don’t have the facts or the law, abuse the plaintiff/defendant.
25 posted on
04/05/2012 8:04:55 AM PDT by
tumblindice
(our new, happy lives)
To: tumblindice
It goes a little bit differently in military court ...
If you don't have the facts, argue the law.
If you don't have the law, argue the facts.
If you don't have the facts or the law, pound on the table and accuse the commanders of being unfeeling and unfair.
26 posted on
04/05/2012 8:07:57 AM PDT by
BlueLancer
("No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full" (Sulla))
To: tumblindice
We used to have a civilian counsel who would represent soldiers in military courts who had a standard argument whenever he made an objection or a motion against evidence or a witness' testimony ...
Judge: "Do you have a basis for your objection/motion, counsel?
Civilian attorney: "Well, Your Honor, it just tain't fair ... tain't fair at all ...
28 posted on
04/05/2012 8:10:11 AM PDT by
BlueLancer
("No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full" (Sulla))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson