Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

I nearly saw a lib’s head explode once over my statement of

“simply being a good idea doesn’t mean that the government legally has the power to do it”


58 posted on 04/04/2012 11:44:18 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
My point exactly!

They simply cannot wrap their minds around the concept that the government doesn't have an unlimited mandate to wield unlimited power in innumerable ways - so long as it is in service of “a good idea” or accomplishes a “societal good”.

They really have no concept of a government of LIMITED and ENUMERATED powers.

Witness Kagan (IIRC) talking about ‘it sounds like a boatload of money rather than an imposition’ or whatever - in answer to a question as to the Constitutionality of the mandate. Sort of a “Hey it is a financial windfall - take the money - who cares if the government has the power to regulate in that fashion - taking the money would be a good thing”.

60 posted on 04/04/2012 11:50:36 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: MrB
“simply being a good idea doesn’t mean that the government legally has the power to do it”

I wouldn't go there. Govt run anything is never a good idea. You are conceding that Obamacare is a good idea? Are you nuts?

78 posted on 04/04/2012 1:57:18 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson