.
.
.
never before has such a specious collection of syllables been passed of by even the NYTimes as pertaining.
LINDA GREENHOUSE: Please, rule me. I only desire freedoms that require no responsibility from me. Bahhh, bahhh, bahh...
I wasted my time reading this pablum thinking there might be an rational intelligent argument presented.....to justify the court not overturning Obamacare....
I guess I was expecting too much from a libtard...
This just scares me. There’s too many people in this country now that sincerely believe there is no limit to the government’s power. Too many people think the Constitution is out of date. I think they should just go make their own country and leave us alone.
Not just stupid, but ape-like ugly to boot.
The answer is that the Commerce Clause was never intended to trump all.
Note on the NYT website:
“Beginning in April, visitors to NYTimes.com will have access to 10 free articles per month instead of 20.”
If you eliminate the fillers and extenders, the only points seem to be:
Never before? How about never again. As in never again should a government enjoy a level of police state power that allows rounding up dissidents, loading them in box cars, and hauling them to the gas chambers. Roe vs Wade permits an arbitrary standard for “living human being” so dissidents can be declared “not living” by the police state allowing their imprisonment and execusion without benefit of trial.
No need to continue our questions about the law. It is simply Unconstitutional and should be repealed.
It really does not take a genius (or even a college graduate) to figure this out. Our problem is that with the assignment of such liberal justices to Supreme Court, that law has become meaningless.
That of course means that the Liberal justices either need to rethink the Constitution or resign from the court. I know, fat chance but that is the only thing that might, just might save America as we know it.
You know what’s really funny...sad...but funny is that the federal government years ago mandated that a person could not be turned away for medical care. Now we have a “problem” that the uninsured are causing a “cost shifting” to those that do have insurance. As usual the government created a problem that they are now trying to fix via unconstitutional means.
And...the other incredible thing is all those uninsured were already “baked in” to the current premiums we all pay anyway. A solution that wasn’t necessary in the first place...unless you want to take over the society...something like student loans...the next problem that will implode.
The first paragraph of this screed is breathtaking!!
This illuminates the mindset of all Liberals, including the MSM. They give lip service to the fact that intellectual debate, including journalism, requires giving weight to both sides of an arguement ... so they brand the other side’s arguements as without merit, and “treat them as cranks”.
This explains:
Pilosi’s “Are You Serious!” response to questions of the unconstitutionality of the health care mandate;
The global warming debate;
The Obama birth certificate debate;
(there is not enough room to list them all).