[MrB]

Wow... just wow...

They show their disdain for the Constitution,
and at the same time implicitly threaten disobedience to the rulings of the court if they rule against them?

[MaxMax]

Why not, they have Boehner to back them up. The speaker has done nothing to back up
the Constitution and fight against unconstitutional laws and rulings. Accept talk.

Isn't this a veiled threat against the SCOTUS?
The Communists are winning.

[Hostage]

I am not sure it was so implicit a threat.

Uphold Obamacare —> SCOTUS is credible —> Obedience

Strike Obamacare —> SCOTUS is not credible —> Disobedience

This is very interesting to think what Kerry has in mind if people don’t obey the SCOTUS. Just what would they disobey?

[Lex Gabba]

It serves as a warning as to why we CANNOT let the dems control both Houses of Congress...article III has a hidden bomb in it: In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. what that means practically is that Congress could, simply by passing a law, make a case off limits for the SC to hear. So far the Congress' respect for due process and democracy has caused them not to exercise that power, but with these guys?