HI law provides that when an unadoption takes place the original BC takes the place of the supplemental BC. Either one would be a paper document.
Since a real scan of a paper document doesn’t act like Obama’s “scan”, what he showed is not from a paper document. It can’t be from either the original or the supplemental BC at the HDOH. And in fact, it can’t be from ANYTHING certified that Fuddy might have sent him - which to be certified has to be on paper.
There is no way that what Obama posted was a scan of what Fuddy sent him, and that means that Fuddy is deceiving the entire nation - which is misprision of forgery and/or fraud and is a federal felony.
So we already know that AT LEAST Fuddy is engaging in crime to cover for Obama.
And actually, because the fraud perpetrated by Obama was against the people of Maricopa County, Arizona, the misprision of that fraud was also against the people of Maricopa County, Arizona, and Sheriff Joe would presumably be within his jurisdiction to charge her with it...
I wonder how soon they could arrest her.
What section of Hawaiian law? The Section on adoptions is pretty extensive.
Apart from that, when you have a State Judge involved, It has been my experience that the law means whatever THEY say it means. I have little doubt that an Attorney working with a judge can produce results that can only be described as a "legal miracle."
Of only one thing am I certain regarding What can and cannot be done legally in Hawaii; That nothing is "certain."
If the truth eventually comes out, I think it is very likely that nobody in Hawaii will have been found to have broken any laws. I believe they will all have legal excuses for what they did.