Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: katieanna

Start from the bottom and read to top for actions of the Court today. It seems apparent to me that the liberal justices know the mandate is gone and they are arguing their best to salvage the rest. The Chief Roberts rightly pointed out the “sweeteners” put into the mandate to bring more congressional votes on board.


2 posted on 03/28/2012 8:40:16 AM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: katieanna

Clearly to Kagan and Ginsberg the Constitution is a sheet of paper with invisible ink on it. Plus, they’re crazy.


3 posted on 03/28/2012 8:43:32 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna

TY

BFL


4 posted on 03/28/2012 8:44:05 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Stand with God and Sarah, the Gipper and Newt will be standing next to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna

Justice Scalia says it’s “unrealistic” to leave it to Congress to figure out what to do with the rest of the law if the insurance mandate is struck down. He suggests it would be better to invalidate the whole thing and let Congress start from scratch. Mr. Kneedler, in response, said such a move would violate principles of judicial restraint.

I love Scalia!


5 posted on 03/28/2012 8:44:44 AM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2864920/posts


6 posted on 03/28/2012 8:45:09 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna

I have a feeling the individual mandate is just the first domino. Once that falls the rest of the healthcare law will fragment.


7 posted on 03/28/2012 8:45:37 AM PDT by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna
If there is a silver lining to the horror of leaving the rest of Obamacare intact is that stripped of the "mandate" revenue, the fiscal disaster resulting will be impossible for the economy to sustain. That horror should be enough for Roberts' 10:13 thoughts to prevail. (10-13, Obamacare down!!!)
11 posted on 03/28/2012 8:50:20 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Steyn: "If Greece has been knocking back the ouzo, we're face down in the vat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna

“without the mandate, the health law would be a “hollowed-out shell.”

Hold that vision!


14 posted on 03/28/2012 8:53:41 AM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna

Congress’ intent?

It is on record, it is fact, that the Congress had not read the Obamacare bill. They were told they’d have to pass it to find out what was in it.

Therefore, Congress intent was “pass the bill”.

Therefore, the proper response is to “strike the bill”.

I’m not sure if it’s urban legend, but I understand there’s even something in the bill about the gold market. The proper thing is to simply strike it all.


33 posted on 03/28/2012 9:22:00 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna

Without the mandate, there is not funding.

Congress would have to raise taxes to fill in the huge shortfall left without the mandate. There’s no way the House would pass taxes to fund this and I doubt the Senate could as well, so Reid won’t even bring it up for a vote.

Romney has said that if the bill is not struck down, one of his first acts if elected would be to grant all 50 states waivers from complying with the bill.

If the mandate is struck down and the rest of the bill stands, it is still untenable. How could Obama run on health care if it means no end in sight for the taxes needed to fund it? He’d be a sitting duck.

My thinking (may be wrong) is that if the mandate is nixed, no matter what is decided about the remainder of the bill, it is dead because it can’t be implemented.


45 posted on 03/28/2012 9:38:19 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna

Statements made today mean little since the ruling will be sometime in June. That gives Obama and his cronies a long time to make phone calls and sway his insiders.

Hopefully, he’ll make snide ass remark about the Justices between now and then and they’ll all vote against it.


92 posted on 03/28/2012 12:34:09 PM PDT by maddog55 (OBAMA: Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson